.
Page 1: daybydaywithVOA_3-01Nov2003.html .
|
.
Usually 2 or more calendar days worth of
news bulletins are packaged together and will appear on this web page depending
upon the amount and character of the news. Each page which packages several
days of news bulletins has a unique designation in its name, "VOA_n", and a
date "01Feb2003". The "n" is a number between 1 and 10, or a bit larger. You
can expect the number "1" to contain the first few days of news bulletins for a
given month. Then the next number "2" will contain the next few days and so on.
Neither the number or the date indicate the exact date of the news bulletins.
However the date "01Feb2003" indicates the month of the news bulletins. The
entire month of news bulletins is stored under a directory on the server having
the date name "01Feb2003". Typically the population of this web page with news
bulletins is 1 day later than the report date.
Note: Each
news article is set out in 3 colored areas. The yellow area provides the
headline. The blue area contains location context, HFY article summary,
HFY comment, time and credits, and email/printer and streaming audio Urls.
The brown area contains the unaltered news item as originally published
by our sources such as VOA, BBC, DOD, and others. Some variation to this format
may occur. The blue comment sections are editorial in character and reflect
this magazines understanding of God interacting in history. Statements may be
made from this perpective about a news article as it might relate to these
trends and social processes that are not always obvious in the news article
itself. Also, some aspect of a news article may be used as the basis of a
commentary that does not relate directly to the reported news article event.
. |
.
(Click here for the news -
directly below this commentary and promotional section):
COMMENTARY -- WAR --
The completed
article.
COMMENTARY -- NEWS REPORTING
-- The
completed article.
COMMENTARY -- US and Israel's
'common cause' COM_002-01Mar2003.html Wednesday,
19-Mar-2003 -- The completed
article.
Jesus Christ is the answer. He is both an example of what we must
be like as humans and he is the facilitator/mediator/interface whereby we can
all know and experience the love/caring of God.
If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you can email
this ministry at thilts@help-for-you.com
Click
here for "Bruce Atchison Reports", World news bulletins on Christian
persecution.
Visit the... Overcomer on line Study Bible
OOLSB articles
are now being added - Click on::
http://www.help-for-you.com/doc/OOLSB_freestanding.html
.
Also check out:
Introduction to the Book
of Revelation
Revelation.html
.
Page 1
Watch for commentary section Comment (HFY)
and also commentary section From a Christian
perspective. Our comments in these sections can often be far
removed from the News article. The blue comment sections are editorial in
character and reflect this magazines understanding of God interacting in
history. Statements may be made from this perspective about a news article as
it might relate to these trends and social processes that are not always
obvious in the news article itself. Also, off topic commentaries
From a Christian perspective are based on some aspect of a
news article that may be used as the basis of a commentary that does not relate
directly to the reported news article event. Usually there is some aspect of
the news article that is the starting basis of the off topic commentary and may
link in other current news. You may also find news updates to an article in the
blue section along with credits.
|
x. . xxx.
.
. VOA news bulletins at a
glance . |
.. . VOA -- Extension Page - Logged 05
to
09-Nov-2003
Key and Feature
world news articles ( published below the URLs
for the VOA scripts ) are those that describe world events that
significantly change or establish cultural and social frameworks. Also reported
below are news events that characterize the cultural and social frameworks
including health, technology and science articles. Sometimes comment sections
are added after the event was published and therefore provide the most recent
information on that event. In that case the most recent news item is not
published unless it adds extensive new knowledge.
| Often, much of the news
is essentially a repeat under another caption, or a progress report, or reports
concerning accusations, coming events, and other verbalizations that will never
get into the history books. These kinds of reports are not published below as
key or feature articles. Often when the news is full of this sort of thing you
will find lists of URLs - usually coming from the VOA home page. |
|
Extension page - the VOA scripts
for Day-05 to Day-09-Oct-2003 are found on the previous web
page.
Click on the following URLs below
this blue box for the script news
bulletins.
Click here to skip the scripts and go to the feature
news
articles. x. xxxx |
.
End of article 1
|
.
The following news
bulletins on this web page cover major world events reflecting significant
political and social changes for the period Wednesday 05-Nov-2003 to Sunday
09-Nov-2003.
This is an extension page
extending the content for the same period as the previous page.
.
. |
|
.
. Mauritania President Wins
Re-Election . |
.. Physical Context:
Africa - Mauritania -Nouakchott - Re: Fair
Re-Election?
Summary (HFY): President
Maaouiya Ould Sid Ahmed Taya has won Mauritania's presidential election and
secured another six years in office. Making the announcement in Arabic only,
Interior Minister Kaaba Ould Elewa confirmed that Mr. Ould Taya has secured
66.69 perecent of the vote, making him the out-right winner of Mauritania's
presidential election.
Comment (HFY):
- But
the controversy surrounding the ballot is not yet over. The whereabouts of the
leading opposition candidate, Mohamed Khouna Ould Haidallah, who came in second
with 18.73 percent of the vote, is unknown.
- Even
at the campaign headquarters, Mr. Ould Haidallah's location is unknown, with
party faithfuls unsure whether their leader has been arrested, abducted or has
gone into hiding.
- Mr.
Ould Haidallah was arrested days before the election amidst charges of plotting
to stage a coup d'etat. He was released in a matter of hours so that the poll
could go ahead, but that release was conditional meaning that Mr. Haidallah
could be rearrested at any time.
- Mr.
Ahmed Ould Daddah, who came in third with 6.89 percent of the vote said that
the elections had not been conducted freely or fairly, and he refected the
results of the poll.
- Mr.
Ould Daddah said that both he and Mr. Ould Haidallah rejected the poll results,
as they were ridiculous, bore no relation to reality and were simply a
manipulation of the truth by the government.
From a Christian
perspective, something "smells" bad about this election.
VOA -- 08 Nov 2003, 22:36
UTC Sarah Simpson Nouakchott,
Mauritania
 
Listen
to Sarah Simpson's report from Nouakchott, Mauritania
(RealAudio)
Simpson
report - Download 264k (RealAudio)
x x |
.
 |
 |
| AP |
 |
| Maaouiya Ould
Sid Ahmed Taya |
 |
President Maaouiya Ould Sid Ahmed Taya has won
Mauritania's presidential election and secured another six years in
office.
Making
the announcement in Arabic only, Interior Minister Kaaba Ould Elewa confirmed
that Mr. Ould Taya has secured 66.69 perecent of the vote, making him the
out-right winner of Mauritania's presidential election.
Mr.
Ould Taya has been in power since 1984. His electroral victory has secured him
another six years in office only months before goernment coffers are set to
swell with newly found oil-revenue.
But the
controversy surrounding the ballot is not yet over. The whereabouts of the
leading opposition candidate, Mohamed Khouna Ould Haidallah, who came in second
with 18.73 percent of the vote, is unknown.
Even at
the campaign headquarters, Mr. Ould Haidallah's location is unknown, with party
faithfuls unsure whether their leader has been arrested, abducted or has gone
into hiding.
Mr.
Ould Haidallah was arrested days before the election amidst charges of plotting
to stage a coup d'etat. He was released in a matter of hours so that the poll
could go ahead, but that release was conditional meaning that Mr. Haidallah
could be rearrested at any time.
Mr.
Ahmed Ould Daddah, who came in third with 6.89 percent of the vote said that
the elections had not been conducted freely or fairly, and he refected the
results of the poll.
Mr.
Ould Daddah said that both he and Mr. Ould Haidallah rejected the poll results,
as they were ridiculous, bore no relation to reality and were simply a
manipulation of the truth by the government.
Mr.
Ould Daddah stated that although he rejected the result, he was a democrat and
would not respond with violence.
Mauritania is a vast desert state in the western Sahara. The
population of less than three million people is deeply divided both
economically and culturally. .
.
Email this article
to a friend.
Printer Friendly
Version
.
|
End of article 2
.
. Peru captures Shining Path
rebel . |
.. Physical
Context: Americas - Peru - Lima - Re: Shining
Path
Summary (HFY): A prominent
leader of Peru's Shining Path rebel group has been captured, the defence
minister has announced.
- Aurelio Loret de Mola said Jaime
Zuniga , also known as "Cirilo" and "Dalton", was seized after clashes with the
army.
- The minister said his capture was
a major blow to the rebels in the central region of Ene and Apurimac, where he
was second in command.
- The group, whose leader is in
jail, has been blamed for the deaths of 69,000 people between the years 1980
and 2000.
Comment (HFY): The minister
said two other rebels were captured and four were killed in the clashes early
on Friday near San Bartolome, about 250 kilometres (155 miles) east of the
capital, Lima, in a jungle area on the Andes.
From a Christian
perspective, one has to consider the motivation of these rebels.
According to the news article their numbers are low yet they continue with
their hostility and ideology which in some ways must have become their "God",
their only reality, while yet being a false "God". Here is the excerpt from the
article. "The Ene and Apurimac valleys, about 500 km (310 miles) south-east of
Lima, are considered the last bastion of the rebels - now believed to number a
few hundred." The Shining Path had around 10,000 members until the capture of
their founder, Abimael Guzman, in 1992. The Shining Path is a Maoist group,
which launched an uprising in 1980. This also raises the question why and how a
Chinese communist ideological rebel group got started in South America. It is
not the only communist rebel group in South America. Who bears the blame for
these rebel groups that seem to worship and die for a Chinese communist
ideology? The existence of these groups not only in South America but other
places in the world should cause us to wonder how long the government of China
has been working on a strategy of global dominance.
Because these rebel
groups have not been successful in the spread of the Chinese communist ideology
it is possible that China has turned to an economic war in parallel to an
attempt to become a super power in order to advance globally their communist
ideology. If these concerns are valid then the longer China is able to persist
in this global objective then the more dangerous it will become to live in this
world.
At the same time as China is grasping for global power over
other nations the Muslim States that form the Islamic Alliance are also
grasping for greater power. The Chinese communist ideology and the Muslim
ideology are heading for direct conflict. China's first major confrontation
will not be with the USA but rather with the rising Islamic Alliance that
resents China's growing dominance in the Asia Pacific.
The government
of China is paranoid regarding social control and manipulation and extremely
intolerant of any institution or group that would operate outside the authority
and control of the government of China. This is especially true of religions,
the Christian religion in particular. The government of China has an almost
zero tolerance attitude to fundamentalist based religions that put God before
government. (So does the USA Supreme court).
Because China is part of
the Asia Pacific bloc of nations there will be a fierce trade war between China
and the remainder of the Pacific bloc nations, especially the Islamic Alliance.
This will become a military confrontation because the conflict will block and
complicate China's plans to destroy the American economy and reduce the USA
from being a super power to be replaced by China. This confrontation will be
the final signal to the American people to wake up and smell the bacon burning.
By this is meant the erosion of the health of the American economy by means of
unfair and hostile trade practices and the ruthless destruction by Big Business
(Corporate beneficiaries of the maximum profit minimum cost business ideology)
of the USA industrial complex and standard of living.
This conflict
between China and the Islamic Alliance will result in shortages of key
industrial products and cause a failure of great proportions in the American
economy because of industries shutting down due to their dependencies on off
shore supplies which become unavailable. Because of this the USA will not have
the oil and other resources necessary to step in militarily and bring the
conflict to an end. Nor will the USA be able to use its vast military resources
to defend itself and extend its reach around the globe. Just as it was possible
for the Japanese during WWII to have invaded the USA, the USA will again
experience this close call as the Chinese government will forgo extending the
war to the USA even though the USA has been noticeable hurt by the trade
problem. This war will ruin the nations of the Islamic Alliance and set back
China in its agenda to become a super power. It will be at this time in history
when the Americas unite with the USA as both a political as well as a trading
bloc and the USA flag will be changed and become the same flag for all the
Americas. It is at this time also that the economy of the Americas will be self
sufficient and self sustained.
Some scary stuff is coming down the tube.
You don't have to believe this but you should pay attention to international
events and you will see what has been explained above gradually happening in
ways you would not have thought possible.
BBC -- Sunday, 9 November, 2003,
22:58 GMT
x x |
.
|
Guzman is alleged to be
leading the group from jail |
A prominent leader of Peru's Shining Path rebel group
has been captured, the defence minister has announced.
Aurelio Loret de Mola said Jaime
Zuniga , also known as "Cirilo" and "Dalton", was seized after clashes with the
army.
The minister said his capture was a
major blow to the rebels in the central region of Ene and Apurimac, where he
was second in command.
The group, whose leader is in jail,
has been blamed for the deaths of 69,000 people between the years 1980 and
2000.
New trials
The minister said two other rebels
were captured and four were killed in the clashes early on Friday near San
Bartolome, about 250 kilometres (155 miles) east of the capital, Lima, in a
jungle area on the Andes.
"Cirilo" suffered a bullet wound in
his pelvis, and one Peruvian officer was wounded.
Jaime Zuniga is accused of being
involved in the kidnapping in June of 71 people working on a gas pipeline in
the Peruvian jungle.
The Ene and Apurimac valleys, about
500 km (310 miles) south-east of Lima, are considered the last bastion of the
rebels - now believed to number a few hundred.
Iparraguirre has kept a diary
which has appeared in newspapers |
The Shining Path had around 10,000 members until
the capture of their founder, Abimael Guzman, in 1992.
Guzman and his companion and deputy,
Elana Iparraguirre, were sentenced in 1992 to life imprisonment in secret
trials conducted by hooded military judges.
The Peruvian authorities have since
ordered that they be retried in a civilian court.
After a two-year investigation,
Peru's Truth and Reconciliation Commission published its report in August - the
result of 17,000 testimonies of people affected by the violence, including
jailed rebel leaders.
The report says most of the victims
of Peru's internal war are believed to have come from indigenous communities,
trapped between state troops and rebel insurgents such as the Shining
Path.
The investigation, in which members
of the commission were given unprecedented access to military documents, blamed
the start of the violence on Shining Path, a Maoist group, which launched an
uprising in 1980.
.
.
.
|
End of article 3
.
. Second Colombia minister
resigns . |
.. Physical
Context: Americas - Colombia - Bogota - Re: Produce Results or Get
Out?
Summary (HFY): Colombia's
defence minister has resigned, only three days after the interior minister
stepped down.
Comment (HFY): Martha Lucia Ramirez was the
country's first female defence minister, and no reason has been given for her
sudden decision to quit. Since she took over, security had improved with
murders and kidnappings sharply reduced. On Thursday Fernando Londono, who
held the justice as well as the interior portfolio, announced his decision to
resign. Mr Londono has found himself embroiled in
controversy.
From a Christian perspective, we should all
be measured on first our attitude and motivation and secondly on the results
that come out of that attitude and motivation. However, much of what goes on in
governments behind closed doors escapes us all - even the press.
BBC -- Monday, 10 November, 2003,
02:45 GMT
x x |
.
|
President Uribe has lost a
second minister in less than a week |
Colombia's defence minister has resigned, only three
days after the interior minister stepped down.
Martha Lucia Ramirez was the
country's first female defence minister, and no reason has been given for her
sudden decision to quit.
She had been in office since
President Alvero Uribe came to power in August 2002.
Since she took over, security had
improved with murders and kidnappings sharply reduced.
President Uribe has appointed a
businessman, Jorge Alberto Uribe, to succeed her.
The new minister is president of the
insurance giant Seguros de Lima, and is not related to the
president.
'Relief'
On Thursday Fernando Londono, who
held the justice as well as the interior portfolio, announced his decision to
resign.
Relations between the minister and
the president had been tense, with Mr Londono saying that Mr Uribe should
resign himself if his political reforms failed to make progress.
Economist Sabas Pretelt has been
named as his replacement.
Many deputies voiced their relief at
Mr Londono's resignation.
"The minister was hampering
discussion and approval of key government bills," Claudia Blum, a pro-Uribe
congresswoman, told Reuters news agency.
"The minister stuck his foot in it
too many times," Antonio Navarro, a leading opposition senator, told the
Associated Press news agency.
Mr Londono has found himself
embroiled in controversy before, most notably in June this year when he alleged
lawmakers had been smoking drugs when they passed an electoral reform
law.
.
RELATED INTERNET
LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for
the content of external internet sites
|
.
.
|
End of article 4
.
. Tension high as Guatemala
votes . |
.. Physical Context:
Americas - Guatemala - Guatemala City - Re: Presidential
Election - Looks Like Big Trouble If Jose Efrain Rios Montt
Wins
Summary (HFY): Guatemalans are
voting in presidential and congressional elections amid fears of clashes if the
country's ex-military leader fails to make the
run-off.
Comment (HFY):
- Campaign violence has raised
fears that supporters of the ex-military leader Jose Efrain Rios Montt could
react badly if he is defeated.
- He trailed third in the opinion
polls but analysts say his support could have been underestimated.
- Tens of thousands of soldiers and
police have been deployed.
- Late on Saturday, Ronaldo Morales
- a political secretary of one of the leading contenders Alvaro Colom - was
shot and injured by unidentified gunmen at his home.
- Mr Morales' wife said the attack
was politically motivated and blamed it on the detestable conditions in the
country.
Background:
- The former mayor of Guatemala
City, Oscar Berger, is neck-and-neck with centre-left Mr Colom.
- Behind them is Mr Rios Montt
whose political party, the RFG, is currently in power and who enjoys the
support of the incumbent, Alfonso Portillo. Guatemalan presidents are elected
for a single term.
- Mr Rios Montt led a coup in 1982
and got his name on the ballot despite a constitutional rule that nobody who
had overthrown a government could stand for the presidency.
- It is only the second
presidential election since peace accords in 1996 ended a 36-year civil
war.
From a Christian
perspective, we have to worry about the legal and law enforcement
issues in some of these countries. It is way to easy, as was the case in
Zimbabwe with Mugabe, for a President to become above the law and effectively
become a dictator and turn the democracy into a sham. In this regard the
following statements in the below news article apply.
- More than 22 people connected
with political parties have been assassinated since campaigning began in
May.
- There were riots in Guatemala
City in June when it looked as if Mr Rios Montt would be barred from
standing.
- They were allegedly organised by
his mobs.
- Election monitors also fear that
former paramilitary groups, known as ex-Pacs, set up by Mr Rios Montt and
linked to some of the worst atrocities in the civil war, are being
re-established by the governing RFG Party.
BBC -- Sunday, 9 November, 2003,
22:45 GMT
x x |
.
|
Rios Montt has overshadowed
Guatemalan politics for decades |
Guatemalans are voting in presidential and
congressional elections amid fears of clashes if the country's ex-military
leader fails to make the run-off.
Campaign violence has raised fears
that supporters of the ex-military leader Jose Efrain Rios Montt could react
badly if he is defeated.
He trailed third in the opinion
polls but analysts say his support could have been underestimated.
Tens of thousands of soldiers and
police have been deployed.
Late on Saturday, Ronaldo Morales -
a political secretary of one of the leading contenders Alvaro Colom - was shot
and injured by unidentified gunmen at his home.
Mr Morales' wife said the attack was
politically motivated and blamed it on the detestable conditions in the
country.
On Sunday, two elderly women were
crushed to death in a stampede as they prepared to vote in a city in the north
of the country.
The BBC's Claire Marshall in
Guatemala City reports on long queues of frustrated people having to wait to
cast their ballots.
Our correspondent says many people
have had to travel for hours to reach voting stations from the country's remote
jungle and mountain regions.
'Worrisome candidacy'
Three candidates stand a chance of
making it through to the second round.
There are reports of long
queues of voters waiting to cast their ballots |
The former mayor of Guatemala City,
Oscar Berger, is neck-and-neck with centre-left Mr Colom.
Behind them is Mr Rios Montt whose
political party, the RFG, is currently in power and who enjoys the support of
the incumbent, Alfonso Portillo. Guatemalan presidents are elected for a single
term.
Mr Rios Montt led a coup in 1982 and
got his name on the ballot despite a constitutional rule that nobody who had
overthrown a government could stand for the presidency.
It is only the second presidential
election since peace accords in 1996 ended a 36-year civil war.
Mr Rios Montt was met with whistles
and boos as he arrived to cast his vote at a polling station in Guatemala
City.
Assassinations
More than 22 people connected with
political parties have been assassinated since campaigning began in
May.
There were riots in Guatemala City
in June when it looked as if Mr Rios Montt would be barred from
standing.
They were allegedly organised by his
mobs.
Election monitors also fear that
former paramilitary groups, known as ex-Pacs, set up by Mr Rios Montt and
linked to some of the worst atrocities in the civil war, are being
re-established by the governing RFG Party.
Irregularities
Valentin Paniagua, head of a mission
from the Organisation of American States monitoring the elections, says that in
some aspects the government has shown a lack of neutrality.
There had been interventions in the
political process in favour of the governing party, he said.
The problem of the ex-Pacs has been
linked to the government and he called on the government to stop participating
in this.
More than 2,000 election monitors
are in Guatemala to try to ensure that the election is clean.
The lorries which carry the ballot
papers will be tracked by satellite.
.
.
.
|
End of article 5
.
. US 'wants Iraq council
scrapped' . |
.. Physical
Context: Middle East - Iraq - Baghdad - Re: Iraq Council
Summary (HFY): Reports from the
United States suggest the Bush administration has become so frustrated with the
Iraqi Governing Council, it may be looking to scrap it.
Comment
(HFY): One possibility being reconsidered, according to quoted US
officials, is that of an interim sovereign body as in Afghanistan - a model
that the French have been advocating in Iraq for some time.
- The Washington Post newspaper
quotes a senior US official as saying the administration has become alarmed at
the IGC's failure to make important decisions.
- According to the paper, the US is
actively looking for an alternative strategy.
- It has reportedly become
frustrated by individual members on the US-appointed council who, officials
say, spend all their time promoting private agendas rather than making
important collective decisions.
From a Christian
perspective, true American style democracy cannot take root in a
culture that has not inherently accepted the driving factor of that culture and
democracy which is the American charter of rights (this is fundamental) and
opportunities and has these enshrined in their laws and enforced by their legal
system. This creates the environment within which the American style democratic
institutions and processes can function in security and stability. The culture
and social organization (including government structure) takes a long time to
create the social experience of an American style democracy. This culture has
developed over hundreds of years.
It is impossible to create a Muslim
state and have an American style democracy because in a Muslim state the code
of Islam is not subject to compromise in even the most moderate (so called)
Muslim states. Muslim teachings go contrary to the American charter of rights
and opportunities. In all these Muslim states (and that is what they call
themselves and are proud to do so) there is a political/religious (Muslim) mix
which creates a bias to how life is perceived and how problems are to be
solved.
When the government and the public both express themselves
according to a specific religious preference (Muslim in this case) that is used
to formulate the laws, social institutions, and notion of rights and
opportunities that only reinforces the existing non democratic (clerical rule)
cultural base and therefore the effort of creating in this environment an
American style democracy is out of the question.
From the Muslim
standpoint the religious social order has a government. There is a tendency to
equate the government with the Muslim religion and clerical leadership. From
the American standpoint the government must operate on the basis of the elected
legislature being responsible to the electorate (will of the people) regardless
of religion. No specific religious order dictates to the government. With Iraq
one can say they want to see an American style democracy but the best they will
get in a Muslim state is a Muslim version much like the pseudo democracy in
Iran.
It should also be pointed out that freedom of religion has to be
more than a statement on a piece of paper, it has to be a common experience and
reality of the social order. If sorting this out is difficult in America then
think of how difficult that would be in Iraq.
And sorting this out in
America has become difficult. Take for example the USA Supreme Court bias
against religion, specifically expression of Christian beliefs by Christians in
public service institutions. Here we have an extreme at the other end of the
issue. Religious expression anywhere should not be a problem. The problem
occurs when a state is organized and run by a religious institution that by
it's passage of laws does not give to all citizens the freedom of expression,
religious or otherwise.
Case in point. We have now seen in Alabama a
public official persecuted by the Supreme Court for expressing himself along
religious lines, specifically Christian. But the Supreme Court does not see it
that way. The background is that the Supreme Court first passed a law that they
had no business passing as that capacity belongs to the legislature. So a few
individuals are making the laws and this is not democracy. This law prevented
the Alabama official from expressing himself. His form of expression was that
he had placed a statue in a public place according to some oath made to the
electorate that elected him into his public position. The Supreme Court ordered
the removal of this statue indicating in some obtuse way that its presence was
a violation of separation of church and state. In his capacity as a public
official he was required by law to uphold this Supreme Court ruling or law (in
this case a law that should not have been passed in the first place). In other
words the Supreme Court took away from him the very freedom it was to enforce,
his freedom of expression (in this case religious expression). When this
elected official failed to honor the law that should not have been passed he
was found in dereliction of duty as a public official sworn to uphold the law
and therefore subject to be penalized according to the law.
Elected
officials are supposed to accomplish what the electorate want. If for example,
a Muslim was elected in this same capacity and expressed himself in exactly the
same way it should not be a concern of the Supreme Court but the electorate. We
are talking here about the freedom of expression not control of the state by
some religious entity. Elected officials are responsible to the electorate. The
Supreme Court should not be meddling in how people express themselves as long
as that expression does not deprive others of equal opportunity. One does not
enforce equal opportunity by muzzling free expression which is done in accord
with the electorate. One enforces equal opportunity by ensuring equal
opportunity can always happen but still according to the electorate, the will
of the people. In these sorts of individual and public expression the majority
wins out and one would hope that the "expression" given to the official by the
majority considers carefully the minority. But this issue of freedom of
expression should only be enforced by the Supreme Court, not taken away,
blocked, or removed and made impossible by tons of legal rulings.
So we
have a bias in the Supreme Court itself against the freedom of religious
expression in accordance with the electorate that has nothing to do with the
separation of church and state. But this very bias of the Supreme Court takes
these issues and gives them a perspective they do not have and then on this
perspective the Supreme Court creates a ruling. There are those on the Supreme
Court that are driven by their own personal bias and consequential inability to
delineate these issues in a proper fashion. If the Supreme Court continues in
this fashion then these few individuals in the court will create a situation of
laws that eradicate religious heritage within the American society which
situation will be totally unacceptable to the electorate and America may
witness a major outbreak of protest that the Supreme Court will label as civil
disobedience and the jails will fill faster than water running down hill.
So the integration of government and legal system in a "free" democracy
is a difficult matter even in America that has supposedly hundreds of years of
social conditioning in this respect. But the truth is not that American has
dealt with all these problems or the above case between the Alabama official
and the Supreme Court would not have transpired. It would not have transpired
because the cumulative experience would have dealt with it. In point of fact it
is only in the last two or so decades of American history that some of these
issues are now being brought forward, usually by those that are in a minority
situation and resent how the majority expresses itself and are trying to use
the law to advance their social agendas of change.
So, as long as Iraqi
people insist upon a Muslim State versus a "secular" (non religious control by
a specific religious body) state then a true democracy is not possible. And, if
they don't insist on a Muslim State then they have to respect the religious
heritage and freedom of expression (including religious expression) which will
abound in Iraq according to majority Muslim view points. This was what was
supposed to be happening in the USA where religious expression abounds from a
majority Christian and Jewish perspective. But if we cannot manage it how is
the Iraqi culture and society going to handle it. The answer if quite simple.
Not by discipline but by returning to the old ways. They simply have to look at
how the Supreme Court is dealing with the Jewish/Christian heritage and they
will have no good example of what they have to look forward to with their
Moslem heritage. What they have to look forward to is the eradication of what
is of most importance to them, their freedom of religious expression (according
to their Moslem religion). If the USA is the example, then that is the example
that the Supreme Court is setting. The Supreme Court is setting a bad example.
What happens to Christianity in America will, oddly enough by this example,
teach them what will happen to the Moslem religion in Iraq. Of course they will
not be able to accept this "look" into their own future. So given these
considerations, we have not only failed ourselves, we are now failing the world
by our example.
Jesus said, get the plank out of your own eye before
you take the splinter out of some one else's eye. In another scripture, he
said, the blind lead the blind. Our example in life is everything. If our words
do not agree with our example then we are not to be trusted. (sarcasm) Thank
you Supreme Court of America for setting an example to the world that will turn
off the Iraqis to freedom and true democracy. (end of sarcasm).
BBC -- Monday, 10 November, 2003,
01:33 GMT
x x |
.
|
The Iraqi Governing Council's
days may be numbered |
Reports from the United States suggest the Bush
administration has become so frustrated with the Iraqi Governing Council, it
may be looking to scrap it.
The Washington Post newspaper quotes
a senior US official as saying the administration has become alarmed at the
IGC's failure to make important decisions.
According to the paper, the US is
actively looking for an alternative strategy.
It has reportedly become frustrated
by individual members on the US-appointed council who, officials say, spend all
their time promoting private agendas rather than making important collective
decisions.
'Potential to govern'
But Richard Perle, a right-wing
Pentagon adviser, said in a TV interview he would be recommending against
making changes.
"The Iraqi Governing Council
consists of people who represent large elements of the Iraqi society," he
said.
"If we're impatient, we shouldn't be
because they have the potential to govern the country and govern it
effectively."
Although the council does include
figures from each of Iraq's Sunni, Shia and Kurdish groups, its members were
handpicked by the Americans and there have been doubts about whether some
represent anyone but themselves.
New look
The council was set up soon after
Baghdad was taken, when many in the US assumed the transition to an elected
government would be a matter of months.
Now it is acknowledged by all sides
this is untenable.
Some like Senator Joe Biden think a
fresh look now would provide a further chance of improved international
co-operation.
"I'd use that as the entree with the
French to say we can work out an arrangement here," he said.
One possibility being reconsidered,
according to quoted US officials, is that of an interim sovereign body as in
Afghanistan - a model that the French have been advocating in Iraq for some
time.
.
.
RELATED INTERNET
LINKS:
The BBC is not responsible for
the content of external internet sites
TOP MIDDLE EAST STORIES
NOW
|
.
.
|
End of article 6
.
. US Warplanes Bomb Area Near
Iraqi Town of Fallujah . |
.. Physical Context:
Middle East - Iraq - Baghdad - Re: US Military on
Offensive
Summary (HFY): The U.S.
military says American warplanes have bombed an area near the Iraqi town of
Fallujah after U.S. troops came under attack.
Comment (HFY):
As of this date (Friday, 14-Nov-2003) there have been 4 such offensive
strikes against the terrorists. The White House is saying that the American
Military will adjust its strategies to deal with changes in strategy by these
terrorists
From a Christian perspective, it takes tough to
deal with tough.
VOA -- 09 Nov 2003, 22:49
UTC VOA News

x x |
.
The
U.S. military says American warplanes have bombed an area near the Iraqi town
of Fallujah after U.S. troops came under attack.
Officials say fighter jets dropped three 227-kilogram bombs in the
area where a U.S. transport helicopter was shot down a week ago, killing 16
soldiers.
U.S.
airstrikes resumed Friday after a U.S. helicopter crashed near Saddam Hussein's
hometown of Tikrit, killing all six soldiers on board.
Earlier
Sunday, a blast on a military convoy in Fallujah killed two U.S. troops and
wounded one American.
Meanwhile, a senior member of the Iraqi Governing Council said Sunday
the group will meet a December 15 deadline for creating a political road map to
use in drafting a new constitution.
Interim
Foreign Minister Hoshiyar Zebari said, however, the deteriorating security
situation could delay the writing of the constitution, which is intended to
pave the way for general elections.
His
comments came as a U.S. newspaper reported U.S. officials are considering
alternatives to the interim authority because of frustrations at the council's
failure to make key decisions on Iraq's future. The Washington Post report said
U.S. officials could replace the council, whose members were appointed by the
United States in July.
One
plan would convene a national conference in Iraq to select a sovereign
provisional government, even before the country has a new constitution or holds
elections. France is one of several U.N. Security Council members that support
naming such a provisional government.
Some
information for this report provided by Reuters and AFP.
Email this article
to a friend.
Printer Friendly
Version
.
|
End of article 7
.
. More VOA URLs coming
here... . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 8
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 9
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 10
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 11
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 12
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 13
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 14
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 15
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
End of article 16
.
. . . |
.. Physical
Context
Summary (HFY):
Comment (HFY):
From a Christian perspective,
VOA --
x
x x |
.
| |