x. . xxx.
.
 |
 |
| John
Howard, left, and George W. Bush |
 |
President Bush says he is certain that U.S. forces will find weapons
of mass destruction in Iraq. The president made the remarks after meeting at
his Texas ranch with Australian Prime Minister John Howard to thank him for
Australia's help in the war in Iraq.
President
Bush says U.S. forces are still searching for chemical and biological weapons
in Iraq. The threat that Saddam Hussein could help terrorists use those weapons
was one of the biggest reasons Mr. Bush gave for invading the
country.
 |
 |
| President Bush talks to reporters at his ranch in
Crawford, Texas, Saturday |
 |
While
such weapons have not yet been found, Mr. Bush says he is certain they will be,
as Iraqi civilians come forward and help U.S. forces find where Saddam Hussein
hid them. "He spent an entire decade making sure that inspectors would never
find them," he said. "Iraq is the size of the state of California. It has got
tunnels, caves, all kinds of complexes. We will find them. It's a matter of
time to do so."
The
president spoke at his Texas ranch, where he and the Australian Prime Minister
discussed the North Korean nuclear threat and efforts to bring peace to the
Middle East. They also spoke about curbing terrorist threats in
Indonesia.
Mr.
Bush thanked Australians for their contribution to the war in Iraq, where 2,000
special forces secured Iraqi missile sites and disrupted Iraqi troop movements,
allowing coalition forces to move on Baghdad.
 |
 |
| Prime Minister John Howard answers reporters' questions at
President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, Saturday |
 |
.
Prime Minister Howard thanked Mr. Bush for what he called his
"resolute" leadership during the conflict, and said Australia will continue to
contribute to Iraq's reconstruction. "We think the world is a safer, more
optimistic place as a result of our joint efforts in Iraq, and we think that is
a message, which is resonating around the world," prime minister Howard said.
"We, too, have one aspiration for the Iraqi people that they can live in
freedom and they can run their own affairs and they can benefit from the great
civilization and the great resources which, unhindered, are at their
disposal."
.
.
.
Prime
Minister Howard and President Bush also discussed progress toward a free trade
agreement between Australia and the United States. Mr. Bush said he hopes there
will be a plan to send to Congress by the end of the year.
.
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 1
.
. Columbia was beyond
help . |
. BBC -- Friday, 2 May, 2003, 14:31 GMT 15:31
UK x x |
.
|
By Dr David
Whitehouse BBC News Online science
editor |

US space agency (Nasa) officials say
there was probably nothing that could have been done to save the crew of
Columbia, even if mission control had fully realised the jeopardy the
astronauts were in.
A report to be handed to the Columbia
Accident Investigation Board next week will say the crew were almost certainly
doomed from the moment a chunk of foam from the external fuel tank struck the
left wing shortly after launch.
Damage to the wing's leading edge that
resulted in a "thermal breach" is the most likely candidate for the cause of
the shuttle disaster.
Plans for carrying out in-orbit repairs to
the shuttles during future flights are now being developed.
Throw it overboard
Next week's report looked into emergency
actions that could have been taken had it been realised the shuttle could not
re-enter the atmosphere safely.
These included jettisoning as much mass as
possible, including the Spacehab experimental module in the payload bay,
radiators, internal components and excess fuel.
By reducing Columbia's weight and
adjusting the re-entry trajectory it would have been possible to lower the
temperature stress on the vehicle as it raced into the upper atmosphere.
But it would probably have made no
difference; the temperatures would not have been reduced enough.
There were no "Apollo 13-like" solutions
that could be devised, the report concludes.
Repair job
Questions were asked very early on in the
investigation concerning the lack of a capability to examine the shuttle for
damage whilst in orbit, and the inability to repair damage to the
heat-resistant tiles in space.
When the space shuttle was being developed
there were ideas for in-orbit repair, but they were not carried forward. Now it
seems they may be.
Rescue missions for the future are
being considered |
In recent weeks, a panel of experts has
met to see what could be done to inspect and patch up the orbiter whilst on a
mission.
One suggestion is to use the International
Space Station (ISS) as a photographic platform to image the shuttle when it is
in its vicinity, and then use the ISS's arm to position astronauts in the right
place for a repair job, if needed.
A report on "in-orbit repair" will be
ready during the summer and hardware tests could be carried out in space next
year.
Even if it had been recognised that
Columbia was damaged, it would not have been possible for the vehicle to get to
and dock with the ISS. Columbia was in a different orbit and did not have
sufficient fuel to make it to the space platform.
How long?
One survival strategy is to keep the
shuttle aloft until some sort of rescue mission can be raised.
In Columbia's case, experts doubt the next
shuttle due for launch, Atlantis, could have been prepared in time.
Nothing could have been done to
reduce the heating sufficiently |
But for how long could any shuttle limp
along in space waiting for a rescue?
Engineers say one crucial limiting factor
would be the CO2 scrubbers that remove this poisonous gas from an orbiter's
atmosphere.
No Russian craft could have reached
Columbia's orbit but an unmanned rocket from Cape Canaveral or Europe's
spaceport at Kourou in South America might be designed to deliver supplies and
equipment that would enable future shuttle missions to hang on until a rescue
bid could reach them.
Many things about the space shuttle system
that were once considered but discarded as the vehicle became operational are
now being re-examined (perhaps along with the question as to why they were
abandoned in the first place).
SEE ALSO:
RELATED INTERNET LINKS:
TOP SCIENCE/NATURE STORIES NOW
. End of article 2
.
. India Reacts Cautiously to
Pakistan's Offer to Resolve Differences . |
. VOA News 03 May 2003,
19:24 UTC
 x x |
.
India's Prime
Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee has reacted cautiously to an invitation from his
Pakistani counterpart for talks to resolve the countries'
differences.
Pakistani
Prime Minister Zafarullah Jamali's formal invitation arrived in New Delhi
Saturday, a day after India said it wants to restore full diplomatic ties with
Pakistan.
India's
foreign ministry says Mr. Vajpayee responded to Mr. Jamali by saying there is a
need for careful preparation on the ground to ensure meaningful talks take
place at the highest level. Mr. Vajpayee also called for an end to what New
Delhi calls cross-border terrorism by Pakistan, to create a positive atmosphere
for sustained dialogue.
In a
telephone conversation earlier Saturday, Mr. Jamali told U.S. Secretary of
State Colin Powell that Pakistan will soon announce steps to reduce tensions
with India.
The secretary
assured Mr. Jamali that the United States will continue to promote better
understanding between India and Pakistan.
India and
Pakistan's peace overtures come ahead of U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard
Armitage's trip to South Asia next week.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 3
.
. Poland to Deploy Stabilization
Force in Iraq . |
. VOA News 03 May 2003,
16:16 UTC
 x x |
.
Poland's
foreign minister says the first elements of a multinational stabilization force
for Iraq should be deployed there by the end of this month.
The Polish
official, Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, made the comment in Greece Saturday, one day
after a senior U.S. official first revealed plans for the stabilization
force.
The U.S.
official told reporters the plan would divide Iraq into three sectors under
U.S., British and Polish command. Reuters news agency quotes the official as
saying 10 nations have offered soldiers with expertise in fields such as
medicine and mine-clearing for the new force. Britain was the United States'
main ally in the war to oust Saddam Hussein from power, while Poland also
contributed a small number of troops. Meanwhile, United Nations officials in
Iraq are warning of a possible humanitarian disaster unless moves are made to
swiftly restore power, clean water and a food supply for all
Iraqis.
The officials
spoke Saturday at the first U.N. news conference in Baghdad since chief
humanitarian coordinator Ramiro Lopes de Silva and other officials returned to
the Iraqi capital this week.
Coalition
bombing during the war and rampant looting afterward caused widespread damage
to Iraq's basic services. U.S. engineers, working with Iraqis, have been trying
to fix the damage, so far with only partial success. Reuters quotes the U.N.
officials as saying food rations, which stopped being distributed weeks ago,
would resume later this month.
Schools
reopened in Baghdad Saturday for the first time since the U.S.-led invasion in
March. Many students attended class in buildings with broken windows and other
damage from post-war looting. Reports say most of the pictures of Saddam that
adorned all Iraqi classrooms have been taken down. But teachers say the
curriculum will have to be revamped to remove the emphasis on Saddam, his Baath
Party and nationalism.
Meanwhile,
the U.S. appointed police chief of Baghdad has resigned little more than a week
after taking the job. Zuhir al-Naimi, who has worked as a police officer for
more than 35 years, says he wants to make way for a younger person to fill the
position. During the brief time he was in charge of the police, Chief al-Naimi
was credited with recovering $380,000 in cash from looters, as well as some
gold.
Some
information for this report provided by Reuters, AP and AFP.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 4
.
. Powell Completes Trip to Promote
'Road Map' Peace Plan . |
. David Gollust Shannon,
Ireland 03 May 2003, 19:08
UTC
 x x |
.
.
A senior U.S.
official said Mr. Powell specifically asked for steps against three groups:
Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the PFLP-General Command.
.
He said
Mr. Assad agreed to consider the requests and said that the United States will
watch to see if Syria is serious about a new relationship with
Washington.
.
Mr. Powell's
main message to Syria was that there is a new strategic equation in the region
with the fall of Saddam Hussein and that Syria should accept that reality and
act accordingly.
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 5
.
A team
of U.S. and French biologists has stunned the scientific world by creating a
mouse egg from a mouse embryo cell, and then going on to create a mouse embryo
from the egg, bypassing normal fertilization. The result has far-reaching
implications for the current debate over stem cells and cloning.
The
embryo cell that gave rise to the mouse egg was a stem cell. Stem cells can
develop into all other cell types, allowing a fetus to grow into a fully formed
mammal with different organs.
Scientists
have been able to coax stem cells into developing into many types of mammal
cells in the laborator, like muscle, but until now they have not been able to
do this with reproductive cells. They thought that this could be done only
within the body, because of special physical conditions that could not be
duplicated in the lab.
Now,
researchers have shown differently in a study published in the journal
Science. "Actually, what we saw is that it is so easy that people would
be very surprised how easy it is," said Hans Scholer.
University of Pennsylvania microbiologist Hans Scholer and his U.S.
and French colleagues say, not only have mouse stem cells become egg cells, but
also the cells spontaneously developed into early stage mouse embryos. "We are
doing this from the very beginning, until the very end of egg formation," he
said. "We have a process in the dish, which is very similar to the process of
ovulation in the organism."
In a
laboratory dish culture, the mouse embryo stem cells first gathered into
colonies of various sizes. Within two weeks, individual cells broke away and
recruited other cells to nurture them. After two more weeks, egg cells
developed in the culture. Mr. Scholer says that less an three weeks after that,
embyro-like structures arose spontaneously without fertilization by sperm.
"When we saw this the first time, we were very surprised. We first didn't think
we could carry it on so far," he said.
Mr.
Scholer says the spontaneous embryos could not be used to reproduce mice,
because they contain an incomplete set of genetic material.
If this
technique can be duplicated with human tissue, if it can produce embryo-like
structures that are not true human embryos, the Pennsylvania scientists believe
it could provide an artificial means of providing embryo stem cells. Such cells
are considered the best hope for providing new tissue to treat many disorders,
where old tissue does not function properly. They say their method would
overcome the fears of stem cell research opponents, who do not want human
embryos aborted as a source of the cells.
Bioethicist Thomas Murray of the Hastings Center in New York
State suggests one area where the new technique might help. "If it is extended
to humans, there will be some therapeutic applications that we will celebrate,"
he said. "For example, women who cannot make healthy eggs right now, perhaps
could benefit by this process."
Mr.
Murray says the research will cause rethinking of the ethics of stem cell
research.
But for
some opponents of such research, no rethinking is necessary. Daniel McConchie
of the Center for Bioethics and Dignity in Chicago says that any human embryo
is a life that should not be destroyed, whether it can develop into a fully
formed person or not. "We've never asserted that certain members of the human
species, just because they can't survive a particular period of time, don't
then deserve the rights of other human beings," he said. "In a sense, we're all
terminal, and we don't take away the rights of someone just because he is on
his deathbed."
It is
too early to know how the new study might affect the politics of stem cell
research. Many nations have imposed limits on it. In the United States,
President Bush has prohibited government funding for such research, if the
cells were derived after his edict. Congress is working on a measure to outlaw
cloning human embryos as a source for stem cells.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 6
.
Recent
demonstrations in Iraq calling for the establishment of an Islamic state have
led to concern among some officials and observers in Washington about the
possibility of an Iranian-style theocracy.
Defense
Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said at a Pentagon briefing last month that an
Iranian-style government in Iraq would not be permitted. "A vocal minority
clamoring to transform Iraq in Iran's image will not be permitted to do so," he
said. "We will not allow the Iraqi people's democratic transition to be
hijacked by those who might wish to install another form of
dictatorship."
But the
possibility that a religious government with its base in the Shi'ite majority
could be elected has sparked debate in Washington. Secretary of State Colin
Powell recently suggested an Islamic government can also be
democratic.
Former
Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle, who currently serves on an
influential Pentagon advisory panel, told the CBS television network recently
that the United States would have to accept a religious government that was
democratically elected. "If we want, as I believe we must, democratic rule in
Iraq, then we will have to accept the consequences of freely chosen leaders by
the Iraqis," said Mr. Perle. "That's where legitimacy lies, not in some
bureaucracy either from New York or elsewhere, but in what the people of Iraq
want for themselves."
 |
 |
Richard
Perle (Photo courtesy AEI) |
 |
Mr.
Perle said U.S. officials should seek to bolster democratic forces in Iraq to
prevent the establishment of a religious dictatorship. But he said a
religious-based government in Iraq does not necessarily have to be extremist or
undemocratic. "I think the Iraqis are going to prefer a state in which people
enjoy real individual freedom, in which they are not oppressed by the extreme
forms of Islamist thought for example, the Wahabi-Saudi-propagated form of
Islam, which preaches hatred of the west, which preaches jihad, or holy war,"
he said. "It doesn't have to be that kind of state. And I very much hope, and I
think most Iraqis hope, that it will be a real democracy, in which all the
people of Iraq can profess their religion freely, and live in real
freedom."
Senator
Joseph Lieberman of New Jersey agrees that the United States needs to work with
Iraqis to ensure a democratic government. The Senator, who is running for the
2004 Democratic presidential nomination, also spoke to CBS recently. "We don't
want this to turn into a theocracy," said senator Lieberman. "In some ways, the
Shi'ia Muslims, for instance, never had freedom of religion under Saddam
Hussein. And I think, what we want to help them do now is build a country, in
which all forms of Islam, all forms of all religions can be respected, and not
have freedom compromised in any way. That's the challenge we have. But it's
one, I think, that the majority of Iraqis will support, and ultimately, they're
the ones who will make the decision."
Overall, U.S. officials and policy analysts agree that they do
not want to see a religious dictatorship established in Iraq. However, debate
continues over whether a democratically elected religious government would be
acceptable to the United States.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 7
.
 |
 |
| AP |
 |
| Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, left, Hamid Karzai,
President of Afghanistan, May 1, 2003 at the Presidential Palace in
Kabul |
 |
Last
week, on May 1, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld declared an end to major
combat operations in Afghanistan, saying that the bulk of that country is now
secure. But Afghanistan is still struggling to build its own postwar political
and governmental structures. Afghanistan still has a long way to go to reach
true political stability.
Hamid
Karzai is the interim President of Afghanistan. But many Afghans refer to him
as the "mayor of Kabul" because outside of Kabul, true power remains solidly in
the hands of local tribal, ethnic, or political leaders.
When
the Taleban government was toppled some 18 months ago, U.S. troops needed the
help of local tribal leaders, or sardars, to track down Taleban and al-Qaida
remnants. Teresita Schaffer, former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state
for South Asia, says the U.S. military looked to anybody with authority locally
for help, even though that might have inadvertently undercut the fledgling
central government.
"I
think the tendency of the military at the time the fighting stopped was to deal
with anyone who seemed capable of imposing order locally. And that tended to be
these local sardars," she said. "It's been a somewhat difficult transition to
trying to play a role that is also somewhat supportive of the central
authority. I'm not sure they've got the balance exactly right. But certainly
the U.S. military has become much more conscious of the importance of
transportation, the importance of security on the roads and the importance of
creating conditions in which Afghans themselves can work out the balance
between local authorities and central ones."
Many
people call these powerful regional figures, such as Ismail Khan in the west
and Abdul Rashid Dostum in the north, warlords who rule by fear and
intimidation. Human rights groups have complained about rapes and extrajudicial
killings by their private militias.
But
Nazif Shahrani, an Afghan who now chairs the department of Near East Languages
and Culture at the University of Indiana at Bloomington, argues that the
warlords are really community leaders guarding local autonomy.
"What they
are arguing for is some kind of guarantee for community self-governance by
various communities within Afghanistan, and single federal or federated regime
where a clear definition of the rights and responsibilities of the central
government could be defined," he said.
Ed
McWilliams, a former U.S. special envoy on Afghanistan, says Mr. Karzai is
honest and well-meaning, but lacks the clout for a direct confrontation with
the local powers.
"There's a
sense that he's an honest man, as I say, something of an Afghan nationalist,
not simply someone pursuing the interests of his own particular ethnic or
tribal group," he said. "But he's not seen as a strong player. Unfortunately,
the international community, and I would say particularly the United States,
has failed to fulfill its commitments to security or to reconstruction
assistance, which would have given him some strength within his own
country."
According to
Ms. Schaffer, Mr. Karzai will have no choice but to eventually cement some kind
of power-sharing deal with the regional leaders.
"Governments in Kabul have always had to in effect negotiate
their authority when you got out to other parts of the country," she explained.
"The challenge before Karzai's government is to make his authority in Kabul
relevant to the local government in different parts of the country. He's
unlikely to be able to force his will without taking some account of the
locally powerful people. But he needs to be in the act in a more dynamic way
than he's been so far."
Be they
warlords or community leaders, they will have a powerful say when a Loya Jirga,
or Grand Council, convenes in October to adopt a new constitution.
Arts
& Culture
Business
Health
& Medicine Science
& Tech Sports
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 8
.
Hopes are
running high for the resumption of a serious dialogue between India and
Pakistan, and some observers say that pressure by Washington has helped push
the two toward new talks. Analysts say quick progress should not be expected,
especially on the sensitive issue of Kashmir, which is the major cause of
military tension in South Asia.
It is not
clear what led to the sudden diplomatic moves towards a thaw in relations
between India and Pakistan.
Officials of both countries say no outside pressure was
involved. But many observers believe the United States has applied pressure on
New Delhi and Islamabad to engage each other.
These
observers say the visit to the region this week by Deputy Secretary of State
Richard Armitage is a part of that pressure. Mr. Armitage is expected to
discuss the latest developments with officials of the two
countries.
It
started with Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee's offer to initiate,
what he calls, a "decisive" round of discussions with Pakistan. He has also
moved to restore full diplomatic ties with Islamabad.
Pakistan's prime minister, Zafarullah Jamali, responded
positively to Mr. Vajpayee's gesture, saying he is ready to resume a dialogue
about peace and normal relations as soon as possible.
Aitizaz
Ahsan is an opposition lawmaker in the lower house of the Pakistani parliament,
and a former interior minister. He is one of those who sees outside influence
behind the recent moves.
"I
think hard lessons have been learned over the years because we have seen to be
getting nowhere, war is not an option for either country. I think the hawks are
by and large being gradually marginalized, and I think whether we like to admit
or not, there has been some third-party intervention with the United States,
the European Union, and other friendly countries wanting to persuade both sides
to the rationale of peace," Mr. Ahsan said.
 |
 |
| One
of the summits was held in Agra, India in 2001 between General Pervez Musharraf
and Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee |
 |
Indian
Prime Minister Vajpayee has held two failed summits with Pakistan since 1999.
Both times the talks deadlocked over the issue of Kashmir.
The
issue has strained relations between the two nations for more than 50 years and
still has the potential to derail any upcoming talks. Analysts say in order to
make future talks successful, both sides need to show they are serious about
making progress, and are flexible enough to make necessary
compromises.
"I
think what is needed is a strong political commitment on the part of the two
leaderships, that it is an initiative which has to keep going on, it is a
process which should move forward," said Professor Khalida Ghaus, who teaches
international relations at the University of Karachi. "They have to put in a
lot, they have to open up the minds and show some sort of a flexibility as far
as the issues are concerned."
Former
Pakistani diplomat Mansoor Alam is a cites a lack of careful preparation for
the failure of previous talks, and said the leaders have to learn from past
mistakes. "I believe that this time they need to carefully study all the causes
and reasons that were responsible for the failure of the previous rounds of
negotiations," he said. "It is important to carry out a reality check, and that
is that war is no solution, peace is indispensable for both countries'
development and progress, that unless we cooperate, the poverty in both
countries is going to grow and we will be confronted by some very serious
problems like water shortages, population explosion and environmental
degradation."
The
strained relations have led to huge military expenditures on both sides, money
the two governments might have used to improve their economies and alleviate
poverty. In recent years, the neighbors have equipped their armies with nuclear
weapons, raising fears of a nuclear conflict between them.
Pakistan and India have fought two of their three wars over
Kashmir. The majority Muslim region is split between the two countries, and
there is an on-going Muslim insurgency in Indian Kashmir aimed at achieving
full independence for the region or annexing it to Pakistan.
India
alleges that Pakistan is sponsoring the insurgency in Kashmir, which spilled
over into a December 2001 armed attack on the Indian parliament building.
Following that attack, the two sides rushed a million soldiers to their common
border, and a new war was narrowly averted.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 9
.
U.S.
President George W. Bush Tuesday named a new presidential envoy for Iraq to
help shape the country's transition to democratic rule.
Career
diplomat Paul Bremer will help create an interim administration in Baghdad. The
counter-terrorism expert will be the highest-ranking U.S. civilian in Iraq and
will oversee the work of retired Army general Jay Garner, who is directing
rebuilding efforts following the U.S.-led invasion.
Mr.
Bremer, who prefers to be called "Jerry," met with the president in the Oval
Office Tuesday where Mr. Bush said he wants to see "an orderly country" that is
"free and at peace," where Iraqi civilians have a chance to achieve their
dreams.
"In
selecting Jerry Bremer, our country will be sending one of our best citizens.
He is a man with enormous experience. He is a person who knows how to get
things done," Mr. Bush said.
Mr. Bremer,
61, worked for former Secretaries of State William Rogers and Henry Kissinger.
He served as U.S. ambassador-at-large for counter-terrorism from 1986 to 1989.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. End of article 10
.
 |
 |
| AP |
 |
| Kenneth Bowersox, left, Donald Pettit aboard a plane
heading to Moscow |
 |
The two
American astronauts and one Russian cosmonaut who returned from space during
the weekend say they are glad to be back on earth after spending nearly six
months on the International Space Station. They also say it still is not clear
why their Russian Soyuz spacecraft landed nearly 500 kilometers off target in
Kazakhstan.
The three men
looked somewhat fatigued but also relaxed as they talked with reporters about
their space mission, which ended Sunday.
All
three, American astronauts Kenneth Bowersox and Donald Pettit and Russian
cosmonaut Nikolai Budarin, said they were always confident of arriving home
safely, despite the off-target landing. Their craft landed about 500 kilometers
from its intended touchdown site.
 |
 |
| AP |
 |
| Russian spotters carry a stretcher holding astronaut
Donald Pettit to helicopter |
 |
The
three men had to wait more than two hours as rescue planes and helicopters
searched the isolated steppes of Kazakhstan for their Soyuz
capsule.
Although space officials in Russia and the United States were
anxious until the men were finally located, Mr. Pettit said he and his crew
mates were not all that upset.
"We had been
prepared that the landing site was going to be a bit of a mob scene, with lots
of people and hustle and bustle and everything," he said. "And I was actually
relieved to ooze out of the spacecraft and lay on mother earth and just have a
solitude moment in which to get reacquainted."
 |
 |
| AP |
 |
| Russian cosmonaut Nikolai Budarin waves as he arrives at a
military airport outside Moscow |
 |
For
reasons that still are not clear, the Soyuz reentered the earth's atmosphere at
a much steeper angle than planned, something known as a ballistic
landing.
An
investigation is now under way to determine exactly why this
happened.
But the
crewmembers say there was nothing they recall doing that resulted in the
steeper trajectory.
The
three are now undergoing medical tests and extensive debriefing about their
overall mission, which had to be extended by two months after the destruction
of the U.S. space shuttle Columbia in February.
Columbia disintegrated as it re-entered earth's atmosphere,
killing all seven crewmembers. |