.

Page 1: daybydaywithVOA_2-01May2003.html

.

.

Usually 2 or more calendar days worth of news bulletins are packaged together and will appear on this web page depending upon the amount and character of the news. Each page which packages several days of news bulletins has a unique designation in its name, "VOA_n", and a date "01Feb2003". The "n" is a number between 1 and 10, or a bit larger. You can expect the number "1" to contain the first few days of news bulletins for a given month. Then the next number "2" will contain the next few days and so on. Neither the number or the date indicate the exact date of the news bulletins. However the date "01Feb2003" indicates the month of the news bulletins. The entire month of news bulletins is stored under a directory on the server having the date name "01Feb2003". Typically the population of this web page with news bulletins may trail the actual date of those bulletins by no more than one or more days.

.Note: When clicking on URLs on this web page, you may often be connected to another web site.

.

.

(Click here for the news - directly below this commentary and promotional section):

COMMENTARY -- WAR -- The completed article.

COMMENTARY -- NEWS REPORTING -- The completed article.

COMMENTARY -- US and Israel's 'common cause'
COM_002-01Mar2003.html Wednesday, 19-Mar-2003 --
The completed article.

Jesus Christ is the answer. He is both an example of what we must be like as humans and he is the facilitator/mediator/interface whereby we can all know and experience the love/caring of God.

If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you can email this ministry at thilts@help-for-you.com

Click here for "Bruce Atchison Reports", World news bulletins on Christian persecution.

Visit the...
Overcomer on line Study Bible
OOLSB articles are now being added - Click on:: http://www.help-for-you.com/doc/OOLSB_freestanding.html
.

Also check out:

Introduction to the Book of Revelation

Revelation.html

.

Back to the WORLD NEWS

Page 1




x.
.
xxx.
.

.
Day By Day With VOA
.
.


.

.
Bush: 'Certain' Weapons of Mass Destruction Will Be Found in Iraq
.

.
Scott Stearns
Crawford, Texas
03 May 2003, 18:39 UTC

Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version



Listen to Scott Stearns' report (RealAudio) 
Stearns report - Download 264k (RealAudio) 

x
x
.


<b>John Howard, left, and George W. Bush</b>
John Howard, left, and George W. Bush
President Bush says he is certain that U.S. forces will find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. The president made the remarks after meeting at his Texas ranch with Australian Prime Minister John Howard to thank him for Australia's help in the war in Iraq. 

President Bush says U.S. forces are still searching for chemical and biological weapons in Iraq. The threat that Saddam Hussein could help terrorists use those weapons was one of the biggest reasons Mr. Bush gave for invading the country.
 
 

<b>President Bush talks to reporters at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, Saturday</b>
President Bush talks to reporters at his ranch in Crawford, Texas, Saturday
While such weapons have not yet been found, Mr. Bush says he is certain they will be, as Iraqi civilians come forward and help U.S. forces find where Saddam Hussein hid them. "He spent an entire decade making sure that inspectors would never find them," he said. "Iraq is the size of the state of California. It has got tunnels, caves, all kinds of complexes. We will find them. It's a matter of time to do so."

 The president spoke at his Texas ranch, where he and the Australian Prime Minister discussed the North Korean nuclear threat and efforts to bring peace to the Middle East. They also spoke about curbing terrorist threats in Indonesia.

 Mr. Bush thanked Australians for their contribution to the war in Iraq, where 2,000 special forces secured Iraqi missile sites and disrupted Iraqi troop movements, allowing coalition forces to move on Baghdad.
 
 

<b>Prime Minister John Howard answers reporters' questions at President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, Saturday</b>
Prime Minister John Howard answers reporters' questions at President Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas, Saturday

.

Prime Minister Howard thanked Mr. Bush for what he called his "resolute" leadership during the conflict, and said Australia will continue to contribute to Iraq's reconstruction. "We think the world is a safer, more optimistic place as a result of our joint efforts in Iraq, and we think that is a message, which is resonating around the world," prime minister Howard said. "We, too, have one aspiration for the Iraqi people that they can live in freedom and they can run their own affairs and they can benefit from the great civilization and the great resources which, unhindered, are at their disposal."
.
.
.

Prime Minister Howard and President Bush also discussed progress toward a free trade agreement between Australia and the United States. Mr. Bush said he hopes there will be a plan to send to Congress by the end of the year.

.

.


Text of President Bush's Radio Address 5/03/03
Bush Hosts Australian Prime Minister at Texas Ranch

 

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 1

.

.
Columbia was beyond help
.

.
BBC -- Friday, 2 May, 2003, 14:31 GMT 15:31 UK
x
x
.

 
By Dr David Whitehouse 
BBC News Online science editor 

US space agency (Nasa) officials say there was probably nothing that could have been done to save the crew of Columbia, even if mission control had fully realised the jeopardy the astronauts were in.

Columbia, AP

A report to be handed to the Columbia Accident Investigation Board next week will say the crew were almost certainly doomed from the moment a chunk of foam from the external fuel tank struck the left wing shortly after launch.

Damage to the wing's leading edge that resulted in a "thermal breach" is the most likely candidate for the cause of the shuttle disaster.

Plans for carrying out in-orbit repairs to the shuttles during future flights are now being developed. 

Throw it overboard

Next week's report looked into emergency actions that could have been taken had it been realised the shuttle could not re-enter the atmosphere safely.

These included jettisoning as much mass as possible, including the Spacehab experimental module in the payload bay, radiators, internal components and excess fuel.

By reducing Columbia's weight and adjusting the re-entry trajectory it would have been possible to lower the temperature stress on the vehicle as it raced into the upper atmosphere.

But it would probably have made no difference; the temperatures would not have been reduced enough.

There were no "Apollo 13-like" solutions that could be devised, the report concludes.

Repair job

Questions were asked very early on in the investigation concerning the lack of a capability to examine the shuttle for damage whilst in orbit, and the inability to repair damage to the heat-resistant tiles in space.

When the space shuttle was being developed there were ideas for in-orbit repair, but they were not carried forward. Now it seems they may be. 

Space shuttle Endeavour in orbit, AP
Rescue missions for the future are being considered

In recent weeks, a panel of experts has met to see what could be done to inspect and patch up the orbiter whilst on a mission.

One suggestion is to use the International Space Station (ISS) as a photographic platform to image the shuttle when it is in its vicinity, and then use the ISS's arm to position astronauts in the right place for a repair job, if needed.

A report on "in-orbit repair" will be ready during the summer and hardware tests could be carried out in space next year.

Even if it had been recognised that Columbia was damaged, it would not have been possible for the vehicle to get to and dock with the ISS. Columbia was in a different orbit and did not have sufficient fuel to make it to the space platform.

How long?

One survival strategy is to keep the shuttle aloft until some sort of rescue mission can be raised.

In Columbia's case, experts doubt the next shuttle due for launch, Atlantis, could have been prepared in time.

Columbia, AP
Nothing could have been done to reduce the heating sufficiently

But for how long could any shuttle limp along in space waiting for a rescue?

Engineers say one crucial limiting factor would be the CO2 scrubbers that remove this poisonous gas from an orbiter's atmosphere.

No Russian craft could have reached Columbia's orbit but an unmanned rocket from Cape Canaveral or Europe's spaceport at Kourou in South America might be designed to deliver supplies and equipment that would enable future shuttle missions to hang on until a rescue bid could reach them.

Many things about the space shuttle system that were once considered but discarded as the vehicle became operational are now being re-examined (perhaps along with the question as to why they were abandoned in the first place).

 

SEE ALSO: 
Shuttle investigators look at Nasa 
25 Apr 03  |  Science/Nature 
Shuttle data offers vital clues 
31 Mar 03  |  Science/Nature 
Columbia satellite check 'denied' 
13 Mar 03  |  Americas 

RELATED INTERNET LINKS: 
TOP SCIENCE/NATURE STORIES NOW 

.

End of article 2

.

.
India Reacts Cautiously to Pakistan's Offer to Resolve Differences
.

.
VOA News
03 May 2003, 19:24 UTC


Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version

x
x
.

India's Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee has reacted cautiously to an invitation from his Pakistani counterpart for talks to resolve the countries' differences. 

Pakistani Prime Minister Zafarullah Jamali's formal invitation arrived in New Delhi Saturday, a day after India said it wants to restore full diplomatic ties with Pakistan. 

India's foreign ministry says Mr. Vajpayee responded to Mr. Jamali by saying there is a need for careful preparation on the ground to ensure meaningful talks take place at the highest level. Mr. Vajpayee also called for an end to what New Delhi calls cross-border terrorism by Pakistan, to create a positive atmosphere for sustained dialogue. 

In a telephone conversation earlier Saturday, Mr. Jamali told U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell that Pakistan will soon announce steps to reduce tensions with India. 

The secretary assured Mr. Jamali that the United States will continue to promote better understanding between India and Pakistan. 

India and Pakistan's peace overtures come ahead of U.S. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage's trip to South Asia next week.


India Wants More Confidence-Building Before Dialogue With Pakistan
India to Restore Diplomatic Relations with Pakistan

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 3

.

.
Poland to Deploy Stabilization Force in Iraq
.

.
VOA News
03 May 2003, 16:16 UTC


Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version

x
x
.

Poland's foreign minister says the first elements of a multinational stabilization force for Iraq should be deployed there by the end of this month. 

The Polish official, Wlodzimierz Cimoszewicz, made the comment in Greece Saturday, one day after a senior U.S. official first revealed plans for the stabilization force. 

The U.S. official told reporters the plan would divide Iraq into three sectors under U.S., British and Polish command. Reuters news agency quotes the official as saying 10 nations have offered soldiers with expertise in fields such as medicine and mine-clearing for the new force. Britain was the United States' main ally in the war to oust Saddam Hussein from power, while Poland also contributed a small number of troops. Meanwhile, United Nations officials in Iraq are warning of a possible humanitarian disaster unless moves are made to swiftly restore power, clean water and a food supply for all Iraqis. 

The officials spoke Saturday at the first U.N. news conference in Baghdad since chief humanitarian coordinator Ramiro Lopes de Silva and other officials returned to the Iraqi capital this week. 

Coalition bombing during the war and rampant looting afterward caused widespread damage to Iraq's basic services. U.S. engineers, working with Iraqis, have been trying to fix the damage, so far with only partial success. Reuters quotes the U.N. officials as saying food rations, which stopped being distributed weeks ago, would resume later this month. 

Schools reopened in Baghdad Saturday for the first time since the U.S.-led invasion in March. Many students attended class in buildings with broken windows and other damage from post-war looting. Reports say most of the pictures of Saddam that adorned all Iraqi classrooms have been taken down. But teachers say the curriculum will have to be revamped to remove the emphasis on Saddam, his Baath Party and nationalism. 

Meanwhile, the U.S. appointed police chief of Baghdad has resigned little more than a week after taking the job. Zuhir al-Naimi, who has worked as a police officer for more than 35 years, says he wants to make way for a younger person to fill the position. During the brief time he was in charge of the police, Chief al-Naimi was credited with recovering $380,000 in cash from looters, as well as some gold. 

Some information for this report provided by Reuters, AP and AFP.

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 4

.

.
Powell Completes Trip to Promote 'Road Map' Peace Plan
.

.
David Gollust
Shannon, Ireland
03 May 2003, 19:08 UTC


Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version

x
x
.


AP Photo
AP
Syrian Foreign Minister Farouk al-Sharaa, left, with U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell
Secretary of State Colin Powell held talks with leaders of Syria and Lebanon Saturday before returning to Washington as he began a period of intensive diplomacy in support of the international "road map" for Middle East peace. He goes back to the region in a few days for a more extensive mission including talks with the new Palestinian Prime Minister Mahmoud Abbas. 

Mr. Powell held more than two hours of meetings with Syrian President Bashar Assad in Damascus and reported progress in efforts to get Syria to cease its support for radical Palestinian factions that oppose the regional peace process.
 
 

AP Photo
AP
Lebanese President Emile Lahoud, right, shakes hands with U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell at the presidential palace 
He told reporters in Beirut the Syrian leader agreed to some closures of offices the Palestinians operate in Damascus, and also to curb public appearances by members of the groups in Syria. 
.

A senior U.S. official said Mr. Powell specifically asked for steps against three groups: Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and the PFLP-General Command.

.

 He said Mr. Assad agreed to consider the requests and said that the United States will watch to see if Syria is serious about a new relationship with Washington. 

.

Mr. Powell's main message to Syria was that there is a new strategic equation in the region with the fall of Saddam Hussein and that Syria should accept that reality and act accordingly.

.


Powell Discusses Mideast 'Road Map' With Syrian Leader
Powell to Discuss Terrorism, Mideast Peace with Syrian Leaders

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 5

.

.
Scientists Announce Stunning Progress in Stem Cell Research
.

.
David McAlary
Washington
03 May 2003, 12:11 UTC


Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version



Listen to David McAlary's report (RealAudio) 
McAlary report - Download 468k (RealAudio) 

x
x
.

Graphic Image

A team of U.S. and French biologists has stunned the scientific world by creating a mouse egg from a mouse embryo cell, and then going on to create a mouse embryo from the egg, bypassing normal fertilization. The result has far-reaching implications for the current debate over stem cells and cloning.

 The embryo cell that gave rise to the mouse egg was a stem cell. Stem cells can develop into all other cell types, allowing a fetus to grow into a fully formed mammal with different organs. 

Scientists have been able to coax stem cells into developing into many types of mammal cells in the laborator, like muscle, but until now they have not been able to do this with reproductive cells. They thought that this could be done only within the body, because of special physical conditions that could not be duplicated in the lab.

 Now, researchers have shown differently in a study published in the journal Science. "Actually, what we saw is that it is so easy that people would be very surprised how easy it is," said Hans Scholer.
 
 

<b></b>

University of Pennsylvania microbiologist Hans Scholer and his U.S. and French colleagues say, not only have mouse stem cells become egg cells, but also the cells spontaneously developed into early stage mouse embryos. "We are doing this from the very beginning, until the very end of egg formation," he said. "We have a process in the dish, which is very similar to the process of ovulation in the organism."

 In a laboratory dish culture, the mouse embryo stem cells first gathered into colonies of various sizes. Within two weeks, individual cells broke away and recruited other cells to nurture them. After two more weeks, egg cells developed in the culture. Mr. Scholer says that less an three weeks after that, embyro-like structures arose spontaneously without fertilization by sperm. "When we saw this the first time, we were very surprised. We first didn't think we could carry it on so far," he said.

 Mr. Scholer says the spontaneous embryos could not be used to reproduce mice, because they contain an incomplete set of genetic material. 

If this technique can be duplicated with human tissue, if it can produce embryo-like structures that are not true human embryos, the Pennsylvania scientists believe it could provide an artificial means of providing embryo stem cells. Such cells are considered the best hope for providing new tissue to treat many disorders, where old tissue does not function properly. They say their method would overcome the fears of stem cell research opponents, who do not want human embryos aborted as a source of the cells.

 Bioethicist Thomas Murray of the Hastings Center in New York State suggests one area where the new technique might help. "If it is extended to humans, there will be some therapeutic applications that we will celebrate," he said. "For example, women who cannot make healthy eggs right now, perhaps could benefit by this process."

 Mr. Murray says the research will cause rethinking of the ethics of stem cell research.

 But for some opponents of such research, no rethinking is necessary. Daniel McConchie of the Center for Bioethics and Dignity in Chicago says that any human embryo is a life that should not be destroyed, whether it can develop into a fully formed person or not. "We've never asserted that certain members of the human species, just because they can't survive a particular period of time, don't then deserve the rights of other human beings," he said. "In a sense, we're all terminal, and we don't take away the rights of someone just because he is on his deathbed."

 It is too early to know how the new study might affect the politics of stem cell research. Many nations have imposed limits on it. In the United States, President Bush has prohibited government funding for such research, if the cells were derived after his edict. Congress is working on a measure to outlaw cloning human embryos as a source for stem cells.


Mouse Stem Cells Transformed by Scientists

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 6

.

.
US Hopes to Avoid Iranian-Style Theocracy in Iraq
.

.
Mike Moravitz
Washington
03 May 2003, 13:32 UTC

Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version



Listen to Mike Moravitz's report (RealAudio) 
Moravitz report - Download 431k (RealAudio) 

x
x
.


AP Photo
AP
Donald Rumsfeld
Recent demonstrations in Iraq calling for the establishment of an Islamic state have led to concern among some officials and observers in Washington about the possibility of an Iranian-style theocracy. 

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said at a Pentagon briefing last month that an Iranian-style government in Iraq would not be permitted. "A vocal minority clamoring to transform Iraq in Iran's image will not be permitted to do so," he said. "We will not allow the Iraqi people's democratic transition to be hijacked by those who might wish to install another form of dictatorship."
 
 

AP Photo
AP
Colin Powell
But the possibility that a religious government with its base in the Shi'ite majority could be elected has sparked debate in Washington. Secretary of State Colin Powell recently suggested an Islamic government can also be democratic. 

Former Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle, who currently serves on an influential Pentagon advisory panel, told the CBS television network recently that the United States would have to accept a religious government that was democratically elected. "If we want, as I believe we must, democratic rule in Iraq, then we will have to accept the consequences of freely chosen leaders by the Iraqis," said Mr. Perle. "That's where legitimacy lies, not in some bureaucracy either from New York or elsewhere, but in what the people of Iraq want for themselves."
 
 

<b>Richard Perle </b> <br> (Photo courtesy AEI)
Richard Perle 
(Photo courtesy AEI)
Mr. Perle said U.S. officials should seek to bolster democratic forces in Iraq to prevent the establishment of a religious dictatorship. But he said a religious-based government in Iraq does not necessarily have to be extremist or undemocratic. "I think the Iraqis are going to prefer a state in which people enjoy real individual freedom, in which they are not oppressed by the extreme forms of Islamist thought for example, the Wahabi-Saudi-propagated form of Islam, which preaches hatred of the west, which preaches jihad, or holy war," he said. "It doesn't have to be that kind of state. And I very much hope, and I think most Iraqis hope, that it will be a real democracy, in which all the people of Iraq can profess their religion freely, and live in real freedom."
 
 
<b>Joseph Lieberman</b>
Joseph Lieberman
Senator Joseph Lieberman of New Jersey agrees that the United States needs to work with Iraqis to ensure a democratic government. The Senator, who is running for the 2004 Democratic presidential nomination, also spoke to CBS recently. "We don't want this to turn into a theocracy," said senator Lieberman. "In some ways, the Shi'ia Muslims, for instance, never had freedom of religion under Saddam Hussein. And I think, what we want to help them do now is build a country, in which all forms of Islam, all forms of all religions can be respected, and not have freedom compromised in any way. That's the challenge we have. But it's one, I think, that the majority of Iraqis will support, and ultimately, they're the ones who will make the decision."

 Overall, U.S. officials and policy analysts agree that they do not want to see a religious dictatorship established in Iraq. However, debate continues over whether a democratically elected religious government would be acceptable to the United States.


Iraq Tops List of Most Dangerous Places for Reporters
U.S. Says Major Combat is Over, But Iraq is Still Dangerous

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 7

.

  .
.
Afghan Experts: Country Struggles to Build Postwar Political Structures
.

.
Gary Thomas
Washington
06 May 2003, 20:55 UTC

Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version



Listen to Gary Thomas' report (RealAudio) 
Thomas report - Download 509k (RealAudio) 

x
x
.


AP Photo
AP
Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, left, Hamid Karzai, President of Afghanistan, May 1, 2003 at the Presidential Palace in Kabul
Last week, on May 1, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld declared an end to major combat operations in Afghanistan, saying that the bulk of that country is now secure. But Afghanistan is still struggling to build its own postwar political and governmental structures. Afghanistan still has a long way to go to reach true political stability.

 Hamid Karzai is the interim President of Afghanistan. But many Afghans refer to him as the "mayor of Kabul" because outside of Kabul, true power remains solidly in the hands of local tribal, ethnic, or political leaders.

 When the Taleban government was toppled some 18 months ago, U.S. troops needed the help of local tribal leaders, or sardars, to track down Taleban and al-Qaida remnants. Teresita Schaffer, former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of state for South Asia, says the U.S. military looked to anybody with authority locally for help, even though that might have inadvertently undercut the fledgling central government.

 "I think the tendency of the military at the time the fighting stopped was to deal with anyone who seemed capable of imposing order locally. And that tended to be these local sardars," she said. "It's been a somewhat difficult transition to trying to play a role that is also somewhat supportive of the central authority. I'm not sure they've got the balance exactly right. But certainly the U.S. military has become much more conscious of the importance of transportation, the importance of security on the roads and the importance of creating conditions in which Afghans themselves can work out the balance between local authorities and central ones."

 Many people call these powerful regional figures, such as Ismail Khan in the west and Abdul Rashid Dostum in the north, warlords who rule by fear and intimidation. Human rights groups have complained about rapes and extrajudicial killings by their private militias.

 But Nazif Shahrani, an Afghan who now chairs the department of Near East Languages and Culture at the University of Indiana at Bloomington, argues that the warlords are really community leaders guarding local autonomy.
 
 

"What they are arguing for is some kind of guarantee for community self-governance by various communities within Afghanistan, and single federal or federated regime where a clear definition of the rights and responsibilities of the central government could be defined," he said.

 Ed McWilliams, a former U.S. special envoy on Afghanistan, says Mr. Karzai is honest and well-meaning, but lacks the clout for a direct confrontation with the local powers. 

"There's a sense that he's an honest man, as I say, something of an Afghan nationalist, not simply someone pursuing the interests of his own particular ethnic or tribal group," he said. "But he's not seen as a strong player. Unfortunately, the international community, and I would say particularly the United States, has failed to fulfill its commitments to security or to reconstruction assistance, which would have given him some strength within his own country."
 
 

According to Ms. Schaffer, Mr. Karzai will have no choice but to eventually cement some kind of power-sharing deal with the regional leaders.

 "Governments in Kabul have always had to in effect negotiate their authority when you got out to other parts of the country," she explained. "The challenge before Karzai's government is to make his authority in Kabul relevant to the local government in different parts of the country. He's unlikely to be able to force his will without taking some account of the locally powerful people. But he needs to be in the act in a more dynamic way than he's been so far."

 Be they warlords or community leaders, they will have a powerful say when a Loya Jirga, or Grand Council, convenes in October to adopt a new constitution.


Absence of Security Threatens Aid Operations in Afghanistan, says Envoy
Conflicts Have Severely Damaged Afghanistan's Environment, says UN Report
US Military Efforts Focus on Security, Rebuilding in Afghanistan
Coalition Operations in Afghanistan to Shift, Says Rumsfeld

Arts & Culture 

Business

Health & Medicine

Science & Tech

Sports 

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 8

.

.
Are India, Pakistan on Path to Resolving Kashmir Dispute?
.

.
Ayaz Gul
Islamabad
06 May 2003, 13:07 UTC


Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version



Listen to Ayaz Gul's Report (RealAudio) 
Gul Report - Download 557k (RealAudio) 

x
x
.

Hopes are running high for the resumption of a serious dialogue between India and Pakistan, and some observers say that pressure by Washington has helped push the two toward new talks. Analysts say quick progress should not be expected, especially on the sensitive issue of Kashmir, which is the major cause of military tension in South Asia. 

It is not clear what led to the sudden diplomatic moves towards a thaw in relations between India and Pakistan.

 Officials of both countries say no outside pressure was involved. But many observers believe the United States has applied pressure on New Delhi and Islamabad to engage each other. 

<b>Richard Armitage</b>
Richard Armitage
These observers say the visit to the region this week by Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage is a part of that pressure. Mr. Armitage is expected to discuss the latest developments with officials of the two countries.

 It started with Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee's offer to initiate, what he calls, a "decisive" round of discussions with Pakistan. He has also moved to restore full diplomatic ties with Islamabad.

 Pakistan's prime minister, Zafarullah Jamali, responded positively to Mr. Vajpayee's gesture, saying he is ready to resume a dialogue about peace and normal relations as soon as possible.

 Aitizaz Ahsan is an opposition lawmaker in the lower house of the Pakistani parliament, and a former interior minister. He is one of those who sees outside influence behind the recent moves.

 "I think hard lessons have been learned over the years because we have seen to be getting nowhere, war is not an option for either country. I think the hawks are by and large being gradually marginalized, and I think whether we like to admit or not, there has been some third-party intervention with the United States, the European Union, and other friendly countries wanting to persuade both sides to the rationale of peace," Mr. Ahsan said. 

<b>One of the summits was held in Agra, India in 2001 between General Pervez Musharraf and Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee</b>
One of the summits was held in Agra, India in 2001 between General Pervez Musharraf and Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee
Indian Prime Minister Vajpayee has held two failed summits with Pakistan since 1999. Both times the talks deadlocked over the issue of Kashmir.

 The issue has strained relations between the two nations for more than 50 years and still has the potential to derail any upcoming talks. Analysts say in order to make future talks successful, both sides need to show they are serious about making progress, and are flexible enough to make necessary compromises.

 "I think what is needed is a strong political commitment on the part of the two leaderships, that it is an initiative which has to keep going on, it is a process which should move forward," said Professor Khalida Ghaus, who teaches international relations at the University of Karachi. "They have to put in a lot, they have to open up the minds and show some sort of a flexibility as far as the issues are concerned."

 Former Pakistani diplomat Mansoor Alam is a cites a lack of careful preparation for the failure of previous talks, and said the leaders have to learn from past mistakes. "I believe that this time they need to carefully study all the causes and reasons that were responsible for the failure of the previous rounds of negotiations," he said. "It is important to carry out a reality check, and that is that war is no solution, peace is indispensable for both countries' development and progress, that unless we cooperate, the poverty in both countries is going to grow and we will be confronted by some very serious problems like water shortages, population explosion and environmental degradation."

 The strained relations have led to huge military expenditures on both sides, money the two governments might have used to improve their economies and alleviate poverty. In recent years, the neighbors have equipped their armies with nuclear weapons, raising fears of a nuclear conflict between them.

 Pakistan and India have fought two of their three wars over Kashmir. The majority Muslim region is split between the two countries, and there is an on-going Muslim insurgency in Indian Kashmir aimed at achieving full independence for the region or annexing it to Pakistan.

 India alleges that Pakistan is sponsoring the insurgency in Kashmir, which spilled over into a December 2001 armed attack on the Indian parliament building. Following that attack, the two sides rushed a million soldiers to their common border, and a new war was narrowly averted. 

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 9

.

.
Bush Names New US Envoy to Iraq
.

.
Scott Stearns
White House
06 May 2003, 19:22 UTC


Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version



Listen to Scott Stearns's Report (RealAudio) 
Stearns Report - Download 114k (RealAudio) 

x
x
.

U.S. President George W. Bush Tuesday named a new presidential envoy for Iraq to help shape the country's transition to democratic rule. 

AP Photo
AP
Paul Bremer
Career diplomat Paul Bremer will help create an interim administration in Baghdad. The counter-terrorism expert will be the highest-ranking U.S. civilian in Iraq and will oversee the work of retired Army general Jay Garner, who is directing rebuilding efforts following the U.S.-led invasion.

 Mr. Bremer, who prefers to be called "Jerry," met with the president in the Oval Office Tuesday where Mr. Bush said he wants to see "an orderly country" that is "free and at peace," where Iraqi civilians have a chance to achieve their dreams.

 "In selecting Jerry Bremer, our country will be sending one of our best citizens. He is a man with enormous experience. He is a person who knows how to get things done," Mr. Bush said. 

Mr. Bremer, 61, worked for former Secretaries of State William Rogers and Henry Kissinger. He served as U.S. ambassador-at-large for counter-terrorism from 1986 to 1989.


UN Units Aid in Iraq Relief Efforts
Qusay Saddam Looted $1 Billion from Iraqi Central Bank, says Newspaper
Search for Human Remains Continues in Iraqi Graves
Top Iraqi Bio Weapons Scientist is in Custody

Email this article to a friend.Email this article to a friend. 
Printer Friendly Version

.

End of article 10

.

.
Cause of Off-Target Soyuz Landing Still Unclear
.

.
Bill Gasperini
Moscow
06 May 2003, 17:17 UTC

Email this article to a friend.Printer Friendly Version



Listen to Bill Gasperini's report (RealAudio) 
Gasperini report - Download 343k (RealAudio) 

x
x
.


AP Photo
AP
Kenneth Bowersox, left, Donald Pettit aboard a plane heading to Moscow
The two American astronauts and one Russian cosmonaut who returned from space during the weekend say they are glad to be back on earth after spending nearly six months on the International Space Station. They also say it still is not clear why their Russian Soyuz spacecraft landed nearly 500 kilometers off target in Kazakhstan. 

The three men looked somewhat fatigued but also relaxed as they talked with reporters about their space mission, which ended Sunday.

 All three, American astronauts Kenneth Bowersox and Donald Pettit and Russian cosmonaut Nikolai Budarin, said they were always confident of arriving home safely, despite the off-target landing. Their craft landed about 500 kilometers from its intended touchdown site.
 
 

AP Photo
AP
Russian spotters carry a stretcher holding astronaut Donald Pettit to helicopter
The three men had to wait more than two hours as rescue planes and helicopters searched the isolated steppes of Kazakhstan for their Soyuz capsule.

 Although space officials in Russia and the United States were anxious until the men were finally located, Mr. Pettit said he and his crew mates were not all that upset. 

"We had been prepared that the landing site was going to be a bit of a mob scene, with lots of people and hustle and bustle and everything," he said. "And I was actually relieved to ooze out of the spacecraft and lay on mother earth and just have a solitude moment in which to get reacquainted."
 
 

AP Photo
AP
Russian cosmonaut Nikolai Budarin waves as he arrives at a military airport outside Moscow
For reasons that still are not clear, the Soyuz reentered the earth's atmosphere at a much steeper angle than planned, something known as a ballistic landing.

 An investigation is now under way to determine exactly why this happened. 

But the crewmembers say there was nothing they recall doing that resulted in the steeper trajectory.

 The three are now undergoing medical tests and extensive debriefing about their overall mission, which had to be extended by two months after the destruction of the U.S. space shuttle Columbia in February. 

Columbia disintegrated as it re-entered earth's atmosphere, killing all seven crewmembers.