![]() |
| help-for-you News | . PRT08-201Article.html | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Note the UTC time and source of information. Pictures may be added | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| . |
News for Wed. 08 May to Thur. 09
May 2002 This web page may be blank on the above date(s). At a later date it may contain content specific to the above date(s). That content would be news bulletins, background information, editorials, and other information as well as information specific to Canada, parts of Canda, as well as other countries and their regions. This information would be of value to those who analyze the news such as historians, teachers, and students. There is also a growing set of world maps to support your research. Battle for women's
eyeballs
Handbag attracts half a million women each month
Women's
websites could pose a threat to glossy print magazines, according to the new
editor of Handbag.com Debbie Djordjevic.
Handbag points to readership figures as a sign that women are increasingly turning to the web. According to stats from ABCe (Audit Bureau of Circulation electronic), Handbag.com is used by half a million women each month, compared with Cosmopolitan's circulation of 463,010. Handbag is one of a handful of websites dedicated to women's interests. Net vs print Ms Djordjevic believes the range of content and the immediacy of the net could put Handbag head to head with print rivals. "Women are becoming disillusioned when they go into a newsagent and are faced with wall-to-wall magazine titles," she said. "They are quite expensive and there is a lot of over-lapping. People are just as likely to buy a book or newspaper." Click here to tell us if you prefer women's websites to glossy magazines
Emma Elms, a senior feature writer at Cosmopolitan, believes that women's magazines have plenty of shelf life left in them. "I don't think online poses a threat to print. It is a totally different medium," she said. "A magazine is a luxury item, it is tangible and accessible to everyone not just those with PCs." What women want Analysts say Handbag is the closest thing on the web to a women's magazine. But James MacAonghus at Aqute Research points out that as a portal its traffic is quite low.
With women accounting for nearly 50% of the web audience, he no longer sees a need for sites just for women. "Women do not need to be considered a special minority on the internet any more," he said. "Indeed if you look at the sites in the US whose audience is mostly female, they are sites that do not target women as women but as people with a particular need." Advertisers do see the advantage of niche sites like Handbag. Speculation about the sustainability of online advertising has constantly haunted commercial websites but Handbag has so far ridden the recession. "The advertising is rolling in," said Ms Djordjevic. "Premium brands realise that they have to put part of their marketing budget into online. They can't ignore it anymore." Do you think that glossy magazines have had their day? Would you rather look at a website than flick through the pages of a fashion magazine? Tell us what you think. Considering how much the average
women's magazine costs, only to be full of advertisements, I think webzines are
the way forward. Handbag.com is a great site and I haven't bought a glossy in
months. You couldn't take handbag.com on a 5 hour train journey though, even
with a laptop the batteries don't last that long!
Natalie, United Kingdom Websites could never replace
magazines. There's nothing like flicking through the pages of a glossy. Plus
you wouldn't get the little free samples or the annoying
leaflets! I hate pages and pages of
advertisements in glossy magazines. You pay a ridiculous amount of money only
to be faced with 50% of the mag devoted to actual interest and the rest being
adverts. At least with online mags you can ignore the adverts and find what you
want more easily and not having to wade through rubbish first. I think mags
have had their day!
Jan, England Women's magazines will never die.
While websites like Handbag.com might attract female web surfers, I don't think
they are competing for the same audience as magazines. The web can never offer
the same experience - going to a newsagent or receiving a mag through the post,
leafing through it, reading it anywhere, anytime. Reading a magazine is more
about relaxation. Surfing the web is about searching for
information. Women's websites are ok for glancing
through and entering competitions etc., but they cannot replace glossy mags.
The tiny image sizes and on-screen format itself cannot compete with flicking
through big and beautiful spreads in glossy mags. long live women's
glossies! I visit Handbag.com regularly and
especially like their discussion forums. You can post any problems or
recommendations on there and get responses in minutes. Much more rewarding than
writing into a glossy mag. I like a bit of both - I'm on
Handbag.com while I'm working but I never miss an issue of Cosmo either. I
don't think the internet will ever replace magazines - people will always buy
them. Of course the glossies haven't had
their day. How the heck would you pass the time in the dentist or the
hairdressers! You can't browse a webpage can you? So that will be the
cornerstone of the glossy's survival.
Donna, England Women's magazines are pulpy, samey
items of luxury and indulgence that I think most women buy as a treat rather
than as a bible or something they actually take seriously. I'd much rather
relax over a cuppa on my sofa in my own home flicking through a magazine than
sitting in front of a PC a work waiting for pages to load and embarrassed by
what I am looking at. I resent paying excessive prices for
glossy magazines that contain only a few articles hidden away between pages of
adverts. If I want to read up on fashion/beauty/women's issues etc. I'll be
surfing the net for the info in future.
Ellie, UK The only time I'd buy a women's
magazine is for a train journey if I couldn't get New Scientist or a cycling
mag. Maybe I'm not typical, but I read websites that cater for my interests,
not necessarily my gender. If glossy magazines were outdated,
the "handful of websites dedicated to women's interests" would never come to
life. Does it make any difference what the medium is if the content is the same
anyway? Absolutely not. There are people loving gawking at sleeky ads and being
bossed around by pretentious magazine writers who in six daft bullet-points can
teach anybody to handle anything. After all, what else is there of interest to
women, right? The result is simple: with a magazine in one hand and a mouse in
the other, Bridgets, Susies and Katies will learn to hate their cellulites even
more and will seek more and more comfort in digging up stories of the best
occasional date of their unknown birds of feather. Give them five more mediums?
They will digest them all You cannot take a lap top to the
toilet with you! You can read a magazine pretty much any where and you can lend
it to someone to read too. Computers don't come with smelly samples of perfume.
You can't fall asleep in the sun under your computer! I think that webzines are
probably most popular with people at work or those who have to spend a lot of
time on the computer. I wouldn't sit down and log on just to read a webzine -
my desk is not as comfy as my arm chair! But I would agree that magazines are
getting a bit pricey, so I don't buy them as often as I would
otherwise!
Tim C, UK It depends what you are looking for.
Some of the websites like iCircle can be very patronising, but so can some of
the magazines. Pick out what you like and leave the rest alone. I like
parenting stuff so I am on and off the pages of femail.co.uk all the time, but
some of the other sections leave me cold. I don't think there has ever been a
'need' for websites specifically for women - how patronising! Websites like
this do not pose a threat to printed magazines - which you can read in the
bath, curl up on the sofa with, take on a long journey etc. and are relaxing to
read rather than having to stare at a computer screen. The two are vastly
different mediums. I find the idea that women need dedicated sites on the web
slightly insulting. However, I shall continue to buy my Cosmos and Marie
Claires for those lazy Sunday afternoons. I too am sick of glossy mags which
cost a fortune and are full of ads - often for things that are way beyond the
average woman's pocket! I don't think websites will see them off though -
remember how 'books' online were going to see off the traditional book? But
with the growth of women's websites, free or nominal cost mags from newspapers
and stores, I do think they will have to rethink their strategies to retain
their readership. I agree that websites are so easily
accessible and there is so much free information. I very rarely buy magazines
these days and I used to buy at least one a month.
I definitely prefer the web for
womens interest issues over print media. This is because it is relatively
cheap, it is fast, in fact immediate, there is access to a huge range in all
languages and I am not cluttering up my environment with paper. Some of the
current sites could do with an image overhaul but, otherwise, I am really
pleased with the huge range of information out there.
The only time I feel tempted to buy
a magazine is if they have a decent freebie on the front of the cover. I'm all
in favour of these sort of websites, it seems with glossy magazines the more
you pay the less content you get. Yes, I do like the idea of a website
for women like Handbag which is as good as any of the magazines on sale. I have
just only found this site and think it is brilliant. However I would still buy
a magazine for the competitions and crosswords as I like doing
these. In this article there is a
comparison between readership figures. Magazines are generally thumbed through
numerous times and are nearly always read/ viewed by more than on
person. I don't think they're in competition
with each other, they complement each other. As I've gotten older my magazine
tastes have changed, as has my attitude to the internet. I now use handbag.com
for information, entertainment and time out but I'll also take a copy of
Glamour on the plane. It's just not the same. You can't
read a website in the bath 'Earthquake risk' from
dams
African dams
may need more careful planning
The researcher says there have been recorded cases in several countries of dam construction causing earthquakes. Large-scale mining, he believes, can sometimes produce the same result. He says parts of Africa are especially vulnerable because of the tectonic forces that are shaping the continent. The scientist, Chris Hartnady, is a former associate professor in the department of geological sciences at the University of Cape Town, South Africa. He was attending a conference here, the Africa Mountains High Summit, hosted by the United Nations Environment Programme (Unep). Pulled apart Professor Hartnady says in his presentation: "Large areas of the African continent are in an unstable, tectonically active state, and especially in the mountain regions substantial danger is posed to growing populations. "The economic cost of seismic and volcanic disasters is likely to escalate dramatically during this century.
Bill McGuire, director of the Benfield Greig Hazard Research Centre in London, UK, says rising seismic and volcanic damage is a worldwide problem. "There's no question that if you dig a big enough reservoir, you're going to get earthquakes. "The Three Gorges Dam in China is going to be a big problem," he told BBC News Online. "There's also the worry that if you build a dam in mountainous terrain that you will get landslides as it fills." A huge landslide behind the Vaiont dam in northern Italy in 1963 took the lives of over 2,500 people when a wave of water and debris spilled over the dam and swept away a small town, he explained. Professor Hartnady says the African continental crust is stressed to the "fracture criticality" limit.
"And partly it's the forces at play in the boundary zone between the Nubian and Somalian tectonic plates. Mining triggers earthquakes in South Africa's high veldt." Real and present danger In late October 1995, the reservoir behind the Katse dam in Lesotho began to fill. Days later people started feeling earth tremors, and one measuring 3.1 on the Richter scale was recorded on 3 January 1996. "I am positive that was cause and effect. In 1964, a dam was built at Koyna in India's Western Ghats. There was a big earthquake in the region in 1967 - cause and effect again. "So build dams if you must, but engineer them much more sensitively than we do now." Professor Hartnady believes geohazards, including earthquakes, volcanic activity and shifting soils, are an underestimated problem. He says: "I wonder whether for Africa they may be a more real and present danger than climate change. We badly need more research, on the sort of scale of the effort going into climate change. "Geohazards are a problem in developed countries too, in places like California and Japan. The US Geological Survey has a wealth of expertise. But some of their knowledge just isn't applicable in places like Africa with much slower rates of motion. "In the San Andreas Fault in California, the rate is something like 30-50 mm a year, compared with 5-10 mm in the Rift Valley in East Africa. But while 5 mm a year may not be sexy, it could be serious." Signal in the noise Compared with the centuries-old records and monitoring from developed countries, Africa's detailed seismological monitoring goes back only about 40 years, Professor Hartnady says. But he is confident that science means it will soon be possible to predict the risks much more accurately. "We need to leapfrog to a new kind of technology, and it does exist," he says. "There's everything space geodesy can offer, including the global positioning system, very long baseline interferometry, and satellite laser-ranging. These will measure current rates of plate motion. "I can't tell people now when the risks will become acute. There could be a catastrophe tomorrow, or we could get through this century without one. "Come back in five to 10 years, though, when we can start to distinguish the signal from the noise, and I'll give you the numbers. The sooner we begin sophisticated monitoring, the sooner we'll have the answers." Nature's medicine maker
decoded
The
soil-dwelling bacterium makes antibiotics British
scientists have decoded the genetic make-up of the bacterium that makes most of
the world's antibiotics.
The information will be used to develop more powerful medicines to fight superbugs and even cancer. The bacterium, known as Streptomyces coelicolor, is found in the soil.
Together with other members of the same family, the bug produces two-thirds of all natural antibiotics. It also makes drugs used to treat cancer or stop organs being rejected by the human body after transplant operations. Microbe war Biotech companies say they may be able to make new drugs from scratch using genetic knowledge of the bacterium. They now know the biochemical instructions for the machinery the bug uses to make antibiotics. The eight million or so DNA "letters" of the bug's genome are organised into 20 groups of genes.
"This organism has twice as many genes as typical free-living bacteria. You could say it's a boy scout - it's prepared. You've got the core of the chromosome, and then there are arms which are not essential but do useful things, like making antibiotics." New antibiotics are needed to fight the rise of superbugs - bacteria that have become resistant to common antibiotics used to fight disease. The most notorious of these is methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, a bug that infects wounds and has become rife in hospitals. The completed genome of this bacterium was recently published by Japanese researchers. The Streptomyces data are published in the scientific journal Nature. Pardon call for Scots
warrior
Braveheart
celebrated the life of William Wallace The Scottish hero
portrayed by Mel Gibson should be pardoned, 700 years after he was
executed.
The call has come from a Tory MSP, Phil Gallie, who has lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament seeking a royal pardon for William Wallace. It urges fellow MSPs officially to recognise Wallace as a "patriot" before the 700th anniversary of his death in August 1305. Mr Gallie said the anniversary represented an opportunity to "right a wrong".
But the Scottish National Party criticised the move and said the Tories knew little about Scottish history. Wallace was the hero of Mel Gibson's 1995 Holywood blockbuster film Braveheart. So far, the motion has received the support of 11 Tory MSPs. 'International name' Mr Gallie also called for Wallace to be recognised as a "patriot, loyal to his country in the days before the Union of the Crowns and Parliaments". "William Wallace was somebody that Scotland can be proud of and today he is an international name," the South of Scotland MSP said. "Surely we would all agree that he was a great patriot and he shouldn't have the stain of treason left over his name. He wasn't a traitor."
Mr Gallie said that a pardon could also bolster Scotland's tourist industry. Wallace won several victories against better-equipped invading English armies. But he was betrayed after his defeat at the Battle of Falkirk and taken to London in chains where he was accused of treason. He was then hung, drawn and quartered following a mock trial on the site of what is now London's Smithfield Market. 'Invading army' SNP MSP Mike Russell said his party would not back the motion and accused the Conservatives of not knowing their Scottish history. "You can't be guilty of treason if you didn't do it. Wallace was a prisoner of war," Mr Russell said. "He was taken by an invading army and executed very brutally as part of an act of war. "It may have been called treason but it certainly wasn't. In 1995 on St Andrew's Day, the Tories' Michael Forsyth described William Wallace as a `loser'. "The Tories haven't changed, they still know very little about Scottish history." Rise in numbers quitting
smoking
Sales of aids to
stop smoking are expected to continue rising More people are
trying to give up smoking with sales of products to help them quit nearing the
£100m mark, a report suggests.
Levels of sales for Nicotine Replacement Therapy have risen massively and are expected to be 160% higher than in 1997. Nicotine patches and chewing gum are among the top sellers by those desperate to kick the habit, says consumer market analyst Mintel.
But despite the sales, Mintel's survey found people still think the best way to give up is good old fashioned will power. In its survey Mintel quizzed 1,027 people and discovered one in three were smokers. Patches and gum Almost 40% of these said they were trying to cut down for health reasons and a similar number admitted they wished they had never started smoking. Men were more likely to light up than women - the survey found 36% men and 29% of women smoked. Women are also more likely to try to stop smoking, the survey found.
The report states that sales of products to help smokers quit will reach £94.7m this year and are expected to be £125m by 2006. Nicotine patches and chewing gum account for 85% of sales, but more people are also turning to tablets to help them ditch the habit. Those planning to stop smoking has also risen - one in five smokers would like to give up according to the report. Combined power And it is the Scottish who seem to have the strongest desire to stub out their cigarettes. Less than a quarter want to stop in south-west England, and Wales, whereas 42% would like to become non-smokers in Scotland. But both smokers and new non-smokers are united in the belief that willpower is the strongest substance needed to stop. Mintel's consumer goods consultant Elvira Doghem-Rashid said NRT was most effective when coupled with support from manufacturers and health authorities. She said: "NRT is now viewed as an effective means of alleviating withdrawal symptoms, thereby addressing the biochemical problems." Cessation programmes The Department of Health published figures on Thursday showing that thousands of smokers are successfully quitting the habit with help of cessation services. From April to December 2001, 153,000 people had set a quit date through smoking cessation services and at the four week follow-up around 79,100 had successfully quit. The NHS Smoking Helpline - 0800 169 0169 - and NHS Smoking Centres in every health authority provide support for those wanting to quit. The name's Tricycle, Agent
Tricycle
Agent Tricycle's
file contained his formula for invisible ink Documents
charting the secret life of spies and double agents as far back as World War I
have just been released for public viewing.
BBC News Online's Claire Hills visited the Public Records Office in London's Kew and encountered the case of one of the more colourful spies to serve British interests.
There was only one appropriate codename for a playboy double agent who had a penchant for ménage a trois. But although Agent Tricycle may have come across as an early James Bond-type, he was vital to Britain's intelligence gathering and, some say, the country's most important agent. Born Dusko Popov, into a wealthy Yugoslavian family in 1912, he was recruited by MI5 to run as a double agent between 1940 and 1944. Communicating by wireless, invisible ink postcards and a special code of microdots, he convinced his German employers that he was passing them important British military intelligence - but in fact all he gave them had been carefully cleared and construed.
His regular room at the Savoy in London and his "appreciation of the ladies" earned him a reputation as a playboy and, until his liking for three-in-a-bed romps was revealed, he was simply named plain old Agent Scoot. One typed record from Major T A Robertson tells how on Christmas Day in 1940, he and Tricycle met for lunch at the capital's upmarket society restaurant Quaglinos. The pair then went to the Lansdowne Club in Berkeley Square to play billiards, before heading back to the Savoy for "dining". It reads: "I think he (Tricycle) enjoyed himself thoroughly once he took part in the Christmas bonhomous rioting, well lubricated by champagne. 'Most secret' "We were picked up by a couple by the name of Keswick who took us to the Suivi nightclub where we danced. "Early in the morning, we returned to the Savoy, both viewing things through rose-tinted spectacles." Under the heading "most secret," one part of Tricycle's file outlines how he was given a questionnaire on British arms and weaponry by a German officer and asked to gather the answers. It asked what was being constructed at various factories in Weybridge, Wolverhampton and Dartford and for "exact details" of the "guns and apparatus" belonging to the British military. It wanted to know about fighter squadrons, how many Spitfires and Hurricanes the British had, and what the Army's armoured division consisted of. Each time, British officers would construct realistic, though inaccurate, answers for Tricycle to deliver to them. His formula for making invisible ink is also in the records. Aptly, he mixed it in a wine glass.
Tricycle's files - which number more than a dozen - are packed full of dated documents, invisible inked postcards, airmail letters stamped with "opened" and "examined", letters to his girlfriends - naturally sent "On His Majesty's Service" - and minute-by-minute accounts of his movements. The agent, who spoke English, Italian, French and moderate German, also described Allied bomb damage to German cities. In one account, he said the harbour at Hamburg had been hit, but it could still be used. Hanover, he said, had "suffered badly". 'Intelligent and cultured' In a summary of the man, one British Army officer said Tricycle lost "no opportunity of disparaging the Germans" and had at one point in 1941 said he was "convinced Great Britain will win the war within two years, due probably to German's moral and economic collapse". He is described in one missive as an "intelligent, cultured" man. It goes on to say: "He has personality and charm and would feel at home in society circles in any European or American capital, being much the usual type of international playboy.
Tricycle refused payment from the British secret service saying he was happy to work for a country for which he had "whole-hearted admiration" and that his payment from the Germans was enough. But MI5 did, on occasions, have to bail him out. As one record puts it: "On Friday 14 March 1941, I met a somewhat tired Tricycle for luncheon at the Savoy when he told me he had discovered that he had not enough money to pay his bill. "From this, it would seem that his previous evening must have been a somewhat expensive one." |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Click for map |
World events are historic steps in the purpose and plan of God. The outcome of history is up to man - restricted only by sovereign limits imposed by God. The future events are consequences resulting from mankind exercising the gift of intelligence and free will in response to situations developing from past events. This human response is either synchronized to His Will or in rebellion to His Will. Behavior is either the manifestation of love or it's opposite - hate. As Christians we should be involved through loving (caring attitude and behavior for others) actions empowered by prayer, understanding, and submission to His Will. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||