.
Page 1: daybydaywithVOA_3-01Jul2003.html .
|
.
Usually 2 or more calendar days worth of
news bulletins are packaged together and will appear on this web page depending
upon the amount and character of the news. Each page which packages several
days of news bulletins has a unique designation in its name, "VOA_n", and a
date "01Feb2003". The "n" is a number between 1 and 10, or a bit larger. You
can expect the number "1" to contain the first few days of news bulletins for a
given month. Then the next number "2" will contain the next few days and so on.
Neither the number or the date indicate the exact date of the news bulletins.
However the date "01Feb2003" indicates the month of the news bulletins. The
entire month of news bulletins is stored under a directory on the server having
the date name "01Feb2003". Typically the population of this web page with news
bulletins may trail the actual date of those bulletins by no more than one or
more days.
Note: Each
news article is set out in 3 colored areas. The yellow area provides the
headline. The blue area contains location context, HFY article summary,
HFY comment, time and credits, and email/printer and streaming audio Urls.
The brown area contains the unaltered news item as originally published
by our sources such as VOA, BBC, DOD, and others. Some variation to this format
may occur.
. |
.
(Click here for the news -
directly below this commentary and promotional section):
COMMENTARY -- WAR --
The completed
article.
COMMENTARY -- NEWS REPORTING
-- The
completed article.
COMMENTARY -- US and Israel's
'common cause' COM_002-01Mar2003.html Wednesday,
19-Mar-2003 -- The completed
article.
Jesus Christ is the answer. He is both an example of what we must
be like as humans and he is the facilitator/mediator/interface whereby we can
all know and experience the love/caring of God.
If you have any comments, questions, or concerns you can email
this ministry at thilts@help-for-you.com
Click
here for "Bruce Atchison Reports", World news bulletins on Christian
persecution.
Visit the... Overcomer on line Study Bible
OOLSB articles
are now being added - Click on::
http://www.help-for-you.com/doc/OOLSB_freestanding.html
.
Also check out:
Introduction to the Book
of Revelation
Revelation.html
.
Page 1
x. . xxx.
.
. African-American Lawmakers Look
Carefully at US Involvement in Liberia . |
. Americas - USA - Washington -
@Congress - Re: US Involvement In
Liberia
Members of Congress say
they support a U.S. peacekeeping role in Liberia. However, African-American
lawmakers told reporters they hope U.S. involvement will be limited and not
place U.S. troops in harm's way anymore than necessary. Members of the
Congressional Black Caucus, African-American lawmakers in the House of
Representatives, spoke to reporters just as Secretary of State Colin Powell was
commenting on Liberia at a news conference in Pretoria. Elijah Cummings, the
chairman of the caucus, said U.S. involvement can have a great impact as long
as it is well thought out.
VOA -- 10 Jul 2003, 23:24
UTC Dan Robinson Capitol
Hill

Listen
to Dan Robinson's report (RealAudio)
Robinson
report - Download 360k
(RealAudio) x x |
.
Members
of Congress say they support a U.S. peacekeeping role in Liberia. However,
African-American lawmakers told reporters they hope U.S. involvement will be
limited and not place U.S. troops in harm's way anymore than
necessary.
Members
of the Congressional Black Caucus, African-American lawmakers in the House of
Representatives, spoke to reporters just as Secretary of State Colin Powell was
commenting on Liberia at a news conference in Pretoria.
Elijah Cummings, the chairman of the caucus, said U.S.
involvement can have a great impact as long as it is well thought
out.
"We do not want to see one soldier die unnecessarily, but the fact is
that our troops, and we are talking about a relatively small number of our
troops, can change the course of history for millions of people," he
said.
Mr. Cummings wants President Bush to make a decision on
deployment of U.S. troops to Liberia before the president leaves Nigeria on
Saturday.
The congressman listed four principles: U.S. participation as
part of a United Nations backed multi-national force, the immediate departure
of Liberian President Charles Taylor, pacification of Monrovia through
demobilization, disarmament and reintegration of factions, and humanitarian
aid.
Donald Payne, the top Democrat on the House Africa subcommittee, said
he hopes the president and Secretary of State Powell make the correct "moral
decision" given the long relationship between the United States and
Liberia.
"The United States played a role in the creation of the
country," he emphasized. "We have been there since 1820. In 1847 it became an
independent country using our constitution, the colors of our flag. The people
are proud to be associated with America, and they will welcome us
there."
But many lawmakers remain skeptical, saying U.S. forces should
not be strained further than they are by operations in Iraq and
Afghanistan.
Texas Congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee said Iraq and Liberia
are different situations, and expresses disappointment in suggestions that a
U.S. troop deployment to Liberia needs to have the approval of
Congress.
"For anyone to say now that humanitarian aid and peacekeeping
troops need to have a vote of Congress, I believe there is a question of
whether or not we treat Africa differently because of its race of people as
opposed to other areas," she said. "And I think the president, in the
determination he makes, and Secretary Powell, need to look at this very, very
carefully."
Members of the Black Caucus say the administration's decision
will be nothing less than a test of President Bush's stated commitment to the
continent, demonstrated by his $15 billion AIDS initiative, and his current
trip.
They say that generally, money in the U.S. budget devoted to
African causes is declining, and they hope Mr. Bush will be ready to consult
more closely with them when he returns on matters of importance to
Africa. .
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
.
|
End of article 1
.
. Astronomers Discover Universe's
Oldest Known Planet . |
. Americas - USA - Re: Oldest Known
Planet
Earth and the solar
system are relatively young, just 4.5 billion years old, compared to the
estimated 14 billion year age of the universe. But astronomers have discovered
a planet nearly as old as the cosmos. The planet is a gas giant like Jupiter,
but 2.5 times more massive. It is in the constellation Scorpius 5,600 light
years away and so far out from the pair of stars it circles that its year
equals 100 of ours. "What we think we found is an example of the first
generation of planets formed in the universe," he said. "We think this planet
formed with its star 13 billion years ago when the galaxy was very young, just
in the process of forming and formed with the very earliest generation of stars
that formed in our galaxy, much, much earlier than the sun." Earth and the
solar system are relatively young, just 4.5 billion years old, compared to the
estimated 14 billion year age of the universe. The finding supports a theory of
an alternative planet forming mechanism. Those in our solar system and
presumably many others are thought to have formed over eons as clumps of matter
collected from the gravitational pull of dust particles and collided with other
clumps. But Alan Boss says without rocky elements, gas alone appears to be able
to amass into a planet.
VOA -- 11 Jul 2003, 01:01
UTC David McAlary Washington

Listen
to David McAlary's report (RealAudio)
McAlary
report - Download 495k (RealAudio)
x x |
.
 |
 |
Drawing of
location in space of oldest known planet NASA artist's concept |
 |
U.S. and Canadian astronomers have discovered the oldest known planet
orbiting two stars in the constellation Scorpius. It is very different from
Earth and its sisters circling our sun and hints of a new and possibly abundant
class of planets out there.
Earth and the solar system are relatively young, just 4.5
billion years old, compared to the estimated 14 billion year age of the
universe. But astronomers have discovered a planet nearly as old as the
cosmos.
Pennsylvania State University researcher Steinn Sigurdsson says
it is 13 billion years old, formed when the universe was still in its
infancy.
"What we think we found is an example of the first generation
of planets formed in the universe," he said. "We think this planet formed with
its star 13 billion years ago when the galaxy was very young, just in the
process of forming and formed with the very earliest generation of stars that
formed in our galaxy, much, much earlier than the sun."
The planet is a gas giant like Jupiter, but 2.5 times more
massive. It is in the constellation Scorpius 5,600 light years away and so far
out from the pair of stars it circles that its year equals 100 of
ours.
The planet is not visible from Earth, but the scientists found
it indirectly by observing one of the stars of the pair with a radio telescope
on the ground and the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope. This star is located in
a cluster of stars and is a rapidly spinning collapsed star called a pulsar,
sending out pulses of light to us as it turns. The physics of the light beam
led the scientists to infer it was part of a pair of burned out stars that
orbit each other. They later concluded a third body was involved, the planet
that swings distantly around them.
"This identification is a stunning revelation," said Alan Boss,
an expert on planet formation not involved in the research. He says the
planet's 13 billion-year age makes it unique among the 100 or so planets
discovered much closer to our solar system in recent years.
"They are presumably stars that are no older than our own sun,"
he said. "But in this case we have a star where it presumably could have formed
not only a gas giant planet but also a habitable planet where life could have
arisen and died out long ago, well before we came along to the galactic
party."
The cluster of stars the planet inhabits is so old that it
lacks the heavier elements like iron that formed in abundance within stars
later, elements that make up Earth and its sister planets. Some astronomers
have argued that such so-called globular star clusters cannot contain planets
as a result, and Hubble research in 1999 backed up that view. It could not
locate any close to their stars in distant clusters, but it appears it looked
in the wrong place.
One of the other co-discoverers of the planet, University of
British Columbia astronomer Harvey Richer, says it suggests that planets began
forming rapidly after the universe began. This could mean they are very
abundant, but he is cautious about this notion.
"We ought not to extrapolate from an example of one," he said.
"It would be nice to say the universe is full of very old planets. It very well
may be, but I think that we have to do at this stage is at globular clusters in
other metal-poor environments to really see, are there lots of planets
there?"
The finding supports a theory of an alternative planet forming
mechanism. Those in our solar system and presumably many others are thought to
have formed over eons as clumps of matter collected from the gravitational pull
of dust particles and collided with other clumps. But Alan Boss says without
rocky elements, gas alone appears to be able to amass into a
planet.
"I really must congratulate my colleagues here for, with one
single identification, solving perhaps some of problems in the theory of planet
formation," he said. .
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
.
|
End of article 2
.
. Bush Travels to Uganda in 4th
Leg of Africa Trip . |
. Africa -- Uganda - Re: Step 4 of the Bush Africa
Tour
The president's trip to
Uganda is meant to highlight his five-year, $15 billion program to fight the
spread of AIDS in Africa and the Caribbean. After meeting with Ugandan
President Yoweri Museveni, Mr. Bush will tour Africa's largest indigenous AIDS
service organization in the town of Entebbe where counselors provide basic
medical services to more than 30,000 patients a year across Uganda. The
organization also supports some 200,000 orphaned and vulnerable children with
assistance from the U.S. Agency for International Development and the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention. Mr. Bush will then leave for Nigeria where
he will spend the night before talks Saturday with President Olusegun Obasanjo
that are expected to focus on U.S. support for a West African peacekeeping
force being sent to Liberia.
VOA -- 10 Jul 2003, 23:09
UTC Scott Stearns Pretoria

Listen
to Scott Stearns' report (RealAudio)
Stearns
report - Download 138k (RealAudio)
x x |
.
President Bush arrives in Uganda Friday on the fourth stop of his
five-nation tour of Africa. The president will focus on efforts to fight
AIDS.
The president's trip to Uganda is meant to highlight his
five-year, $15 billion program to fight the spread of AIDS in Africa and the
Caribbean.
After meeting with Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni, Mr. Bush
will tour Africa's largest indigenous AIDS service organization in the town of
Entebbe where counselors provide basic medical services to more than 30,000
patients a year across Uganda.
The organization also supports some 200,000 orphaned and
vulnerable children with assistance from the U.S. Agency for International
Development and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
The president's AIDS program, which has not yet been fully
funded by Congress, is based in part on Uganda's success in reducing the spread
of the disease by focusing on what the president calls ABC, abstinence, being
faithful and contraception.
Mr.
Bush will then leave for Nigeria where he will spend the night before talks
Saturday with President Olusegun Obasanjo that are expected to focus on U.S.
support for a West African peacekeeping force being sent to Liberia. .
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
.
|
End of article 3
.
The Pentagon may be considering an expansion of the U.S. military
presence in the Horn of Africa, for the first time adding jet fighters to the
force already deployed in Djibouti.
A site
survey team including pilots and maintenance specialists has arrived in
Djibouti to assess the feasibility of deploying advanced U.S. fighter aircraft
in the Horn of Africa.
According to a brief statement issued by the special U.S.
military anti-terrorism task force based in Djibouti, the jets under
consideration for a possible move include the F-15 Strike Eagle, the F-16
Fighting Falcon and the F-A/18 Hornet.
Task force officials were not immediately available to provide
additional details.
But a senior Pentagon official tells VOA the Horn of Africa
region remains what he calls "an area ripe for terrorists trying to find safe
haven."
This official, speaking on condition of anonymity, says U.S.
fighters could be of potential use in anti-terrorist operations in the
region.
Another military official notes advanced fighters like those
under consideration for possible deployment to Djibouti can conduct high speed
reconnaissance missions as well as actual strikes.
This
official also suggests if a decision is made to base any fighters in Djibouti,
it may only be a temporary move. The official says this could be for a short
term, operational need.
But he also notes scores of U.S. aircraft are being relocated
in the region following the end of major combat operations in Iraq. For
example, American aircraft and personnel are being withdrawn entirely from
Saudi Arabia.
There are some 1,800 U.S. personnel currently based in
Djibouti, many of them Special Operations forces. They are occasionally joined
by other U.S. troops who conduct training in the Horn of Africa
area.
The task force's main mission is to detect, disrupt and defeat
terrorist groups in the Horn, working together closely with security personnel
from regional governments. .
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
.
|
End of article 4
.
. Powell Defends Pre-War
Intelligence Reports on Iraq . |
. Americas - USA - Washington @Congressional
Investigation - Re: Middle East - Iraq : Questions
About Intelligence Sources & Reliability
Making his
case against Saddam Hussein in his January State of the Union Address,
President Bush said the then-Iraqi leader had tried to buy uranium in Niger
Africa. Mr. Powell says the president was making what seemed to be a reasonable
statement at that time and the allegation against Niger, he says, "was not
totally outrageous. In hindsight, Mr. Powell says it is now clear there
was trouble with the allegations against Niger, but he does not think its use
undercuts the president's credibility. "The immediacy of the threat from Iraqi
weapons of mass destruction was one of the Bush administration's biggest
justifications for toppling Saddam Hussein. More than two months after the fall
of Baghdad, none of those weapons has yet been found.
VOA -- 10 Jul 2003, 22:01
UTC Scott Stearns Pretoria

Listen to
Scott Stearns' report (RealAudio)
Stearns
report - Download 285k (RealAudio)
x x |
.
Secretary of State Colin Powell is defending the Bush
administration's use of what turned out to be forged documents to help make its
case for invading Iraq.
Making
his case against Saddam Hussein in his January State of the Union Address,
President Bush said the then-Iraqi leader had tried to buy uranium here in
Africa.
Documents concerning the alleged attempt to buy uranium from
Niger were turned over to the United Nations which concluded that they were
forgeries.
Secretary Powell says questions about the president's use of
information which proved to be wrong are, in his words "overwrought, overblown
and overdrawn" as interpreting intelligence reports is not an exact
science.
"You have to make judgments. And at the time of the president's
State of the Union Address a judgment was made that that was an appropriate
statement for the president to make," he said. "There was no effort or attempt
on the part of the president or anyone else in the administration to mislead or
to deceive the American people."
Mr. Powell says the president was making what seemed to be a
reasonable statement at that time and the allegation against Niger, he says,
"was not totally outrageous."
Given the test of time, just a week later, Secretary Powell
says he chose not to use that information in his February 5th presentation to
the United Nations because he decided it was not appropriate after reviewing
what he calls "every single thing" the administration knew about Iraqi weapons
of mass destruction.
In hindsight, Mr. Powell says it is now clear there was trouble
with the allegations against Niger, but he does not think its use undercuts the
president's credibility.
"I'm not troubled by this," he said. "I think the American
people will put this in context and perspective and understand perfectly why
the president felt it was necessary to undertake this military operation with a
willing coalition, in order to remove this tyrant from office, to make sure
there are no more questions about weapons of mass destruction because the
regime that was determined to have them is gone."
The immediacy of the threat from Iraqi weapons of mass
destruction was one of the Bush administration's biggest justifications for
toppling Saddam Hussein. More than two months after the fall of Baghdad, none
of those weapons has yet been found. .
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
.
|
End of article 5
.
. US Forces Must Remain in Iraq,
says General Tommy Franks . |
. Americas - USA - Washington -
@Congress Investigation - Re: Duration of
Occupation
The
general, Army General Tommy Franks, who led U.S. forces to victory in Iraq has
acknowledged American troops may need to remain in that country for several
more years. He appeared Thursday before the House Armed Services Committee to
answer congressional questions about the war in Iraq and the ongoing attacks
against American troops there that continue to claim U.S. lives. General Franks
rejected suggestions that Iraq is descending into chaos following the war. But
he did say he cannot predict how long U.S. forces will be required to stay on
to ensure security and stability. This session followed a similar one
Wednesday before the Senate at which General Franks appeared together with
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to face tough questioning about U.S. military
involvement in Iraq. During his Senate appearance, Mr. Rumsfeld said
large portions of Iraq are stable. He also said in those areas where enemy
fighters are still active, "the problem," as he called it, is being dealt with
in an "orderly and forceful fashion by coalition forces."
VOA -- 10 Jul 2003, 21:00
UTC Alex Belida Pentagon

Listen
to Alex Belida's report from the Pentagon (RealAudio)
Belida
report - Download 248k (RealAudio)
x x |
.
The
general who led U.S. forces to victory in Iraq has acknowledged American troops
may need to remain in that country for several more years.
 |
 |
| AP |
 |
| Gen. Tommy
Franks, the U.S. commander of the Iraq war, testifies on Capitol Hill |
 |
Army General Tommy Franks has already handed over command of U.S.
forces in the Middle East prior to his retirement. But he appeared Thursday
before the House Armed Services Committee to answer congressional questions
about the war in Iraq and the ongoing attacks against American troops there
that continue to claim U.S. lives.
Congressional concern about the ongoing deaths was perhaps best
summed up by Democratic Representative Ike Skelton in remarks to General Franks
as the session opened.
"I have
a fear that the pattern that we see now, if left unchecked, we may find
ourselves, general, in the throes of guerrilla warfare for years. I hope that
doesn't come to pass," he said.
General Franks rejected suggestions that Iraq is descending
into chaos following the war. But he did say he cannot predict how long U.S.
forces will be required to stay on to ensure security and
stability.
"We will be involved in Iraq in the future and, sir, I don't know
whether that means two years or four years. I just don't know," he
admits.
The session followed a similar one Wednesday before the Senate
at which General Franks appeared together with Defense Secretary Donald
Rumsfeld to face tough questioning about U.S. military involvement in
Iraq.
Mr. Rumsfeld did not attend the House hearing, prompting
criticism from Democratic Representative Ellen Tauscher.
"I wish Secretary Rumsfeld had been here today because I have
many questions for him as I think many people do as to exactly what we're going
to do, how long it's going to take and how long [how much] it's going to cost,"
Ms. Tauscher said.
During his Senate appearance, Mr. Rumsfeld said large portions
of Iraq are stable. He also said in those areas where enemy fighters are still
active, "the problem," as he called it, is being dealt with in an "orderly and
forceful fashion by coalition forces." .
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
.
|
End of article 6
.
. US Senate Calls on Bush
Administration to Internationalize Iraq Force . |
. Americas - USA - Washington -
@Senate - Re: Internationalize Iraq
Force?
The U.S. Senate has
passed a non-binding resolution calling on the Bush administration to consider
requesting troops from NATO allies and United Nations' member states to help
stabilize and rebuild Iraq. The measure passed on a 97-0 vote, reflecting
lawmakers' concerns about whether there are enough coalition troops in Iraq to
establish security, restore basic services and rebuild the country's
infrastructure. The key sponsor, Democratic Senator Joe Biden of Delaware, said
internationalizing the coalition to a greater degree would make the United
States, which makes up the bulk of the force, appear less like an occupier. Mr.
Biden said broadening the coalition force would reduce the U.S. financial costs
of rebuilding Iraq and the risks to American troops, who have come under attack
by supporters of ousted leader Saddam Hussein.
VOA -- 11 Jul 2003, 00:12
UTC Deborah Tate Washington
 x x |
.
The
U.S. Senate has passed a non-binding resolution calling on the Bush
administration to consider requesting troops from NATO allies and United
Nations' member states to help stabilize and rebuild Iraq.
The
measure passed on a 97-0 vote, reflecting lawmakers' concerns about whether
there are enough coalition troops in Iraq to establish security, restore basic
services and rebuild the country's infrastructure.
The key sponsor, Democratic Senator Joe Biden of Delaware, said
internationalizing the coalition to a greater degree would make the United
States, which makes up the bulk of the force, appear less like an
occupier.
"We will get a lot more support from the Iraqis, who will be a
lot less suspect of us, if we are not the only game in town," he
said.
Mr. Biden said broadening the coalition force would reduce the
U.S. financial costs of rebuilding Iraq and the risks to American troops, who
have come under attack by supporters of ousted leader Saddam
Hussein.
Mr.
Biden said he believes the administration is reluctant to ask French and German
troops to assist in Iraq because of their opposition to the war. .
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
.
|
End of article 7
.
. False Information unknowingly
passed by the CIA into Bush State of the Union Address . |
. Americas - USA - Washington -
Re: Attaching Responsibility For False
Information
- Documents concerning the alleged attempt to buy uranium from
Niger were turned-over to the United Nations which concluded that they were
forgeries.
- Briefing reporters on Air Force One on the way to Uganda,
National Security Advisor Rice said CIA Director George Tenet reviewed all of
the information in the president's State of the Union.
- If anyone at the CIA had doubts about the truth of that claim,
she says "those doubts were not communicated to the
president."
- Instead, Ms. Rice says there were detailed discussions with the CIA
about Iraq's alleged attempt to buy uranium.
- Ms. Rice says the White House "absolutely" has confidence in
Director Tenet and she is not really blaming anyone.
- Mr. Bush was asked about the issue following his meeting with
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and again defended his decision to invade
Iraq. "I gave a speech to the nation that was cleared by the intelligence
services, and it was a speech that detailed to the American people the dangers
posed by the Saddam Hussein regime, and my government took the appropriate
response to those dangers, and as a result the world is going to be more secure
and more peaceful," the president said.
- Ms. Rice says President Bush did not knowingly say anything in
that speech that the White House knew to be false.
VOA -- 11 Jul 2003, 12:15
U Scott Stearns Entebbe TC

Listen to
Scott Stearns' report from Entebbe (RealAudio)
Stearns
report - Download 269k (RealAudio)
x x |
.
U.S. National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice is blaming the CIA
for not correcting claims that President Bush made about Iraq's pursuit of
nuclear weapons, that turned out to be based on forged
documents.
Making
his case against Saddam Hussein in his January State of the Union address,
President Bush said the then-Iraqi leader had tried to buy uranium here in
Africa.
Documents concerning the alleged attempt to buy uranium from
Niger were turned-over to the United Nations which concluded that they were
forgeries.
Briefing reporters on Air Force One on the way to Uganda,
National Security Advisor Rice said CIA Director George Tenet reviewed all of
the information in the president's State of the Union.
If he had said to remove that claim from the speech, Ms. Rice
says "it would have been gone." If anyone at the CIA had doubts about the truth
of that claim, she says "those doubts were not communicated to the
president."
Instead, Ms. Rice says there were detailed discussions with the CIA
about Iraq's alleged attempt to buy uranium. She says some specific information
about amounts and place were removed, and with those changes, the speech was
cleared.
Ms. Rice says the White House "absolutely" has confidence in
Director Tenet and she is not really blaming anyone.
Mr. Bush was asked about the issue following his meeting with
Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni and again defended his decision to invade
Iraq.
"I gave a speech to the nation that was cleared by the
intelligence services, and it was a speech that detailed to the American people
the dangers posed by the Saddam Hussein regime, and my government took the
appropriate response to those dangers, and as a result the world is going to be
more secure and more peaceful," the president said.
Ms. Rice says President Bush did not knowingly say anything in
that speech that the White House knew to be false.
Yet just a week later, Secretary of State Colin Powell chose
not to use that claim in his speech to the United Nations because he decided it
was not appropriate after reviewing what he calls "every single thing" the
administration knew about Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.
The immediacy of the threat from those weapons was the
president's biggest justification for toppling Saddam Hussein. More than two
months after the fall of Baghdad, none of those weapons has yet been found.
.
.
Email this article to a
friend.
Printer Friendly Version
. |
End of article 8
.
. Conflict Tops Agenda at African
Union Summit . |
. Africa - Mozambique - @Maputo -Re: African Union
Summit : Military Conflicts
African leaders met behind closed doors Friday on the second
day of the African Union summit in the Mozambique capital Maputo. Conflict
remained on top of the agenda Friday as fighting raged in Liberia, Burundi,
Somalia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and elsewhere on the
continent.
But
attempts to make real progress toward settling those conflicts were hampered by
the absence of key leaders. Among those not in attendance are Democratic
Republic of Congo President Joseph Kabila and Liberian President Charles
Taylor, who was prevented from attending for the second consecutive year by
rebel advances on his capital, Monrovia. Presidents Yoweri Museveni of Uganda
and Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo returned home early to meet with
President Bush in their own countries.
- On
Thursday, Mr. Annan criticized African leaders, saying that unspeakable horrors
are occurring on the continent and that peace missions are wasted without
political will.
- On Friday, more criticism piled up over Africa's handling of
the Congo conflict. A European Union envoy to central Africa who is attending
the summit told Mozambique's state radio that the region's leaders have no
political will to solve the conflict there.
- The summit, which is being held in a brand new Chinese-funded
conference center, will continue through Saturday. But journalists, who have
gathered from around the continent to cover the event are angry about the lack
of access they have had to participants. Most meetings have taken place behind
closed doors.
VOA -- 11 Jul 2003, 17:03
UTC Nicole Itano Johannesburg
 
Listen to
Nicole Itano's report (RealAudio)
Itano
report - Download 226k (RealAudio)
x x |
.
African leaders met behind closed doors Friday on the second day of
the African Union summit in the Mozambique capital Maputo.
Conflict remained on top of the agenda Friday as fighting raged in
Liberia, Burundi, Somalia, the Democratic Republic of Congo and elsewhere on
the continent.
But attempts to make real progress toward settling those
conflicts were hampered by the absence of key leaders. Among those not in
attendance are Democratic Republic of Congo President Joseph Kabila and
Liberian President Charles Taylor, who was prevented from attending for the
second consecutive year by rebel advances on his capital, Monrovia. Presidents
Yoweri Museveni of Uganda and Nigerian President Olusegun Obasanjo returned
home early to meet with President Bush in their own
countries.
United
Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan had hoped to meet with parties involved in
the Democratic Republic of Congo's civil war while in Maputo. But that meeting
was cancelled due to the absence of Mr. Kabila and Mr. Museveni. An estimated
3.3 million people have died in fighting in Congo over the last five years. And
the violence has continued in spite of the installation of a new transitional
government.
On Thursday, Mr. Annan criticized African leaders, saying that
unspeakable horrors are occurring on the continent and that peace missions are
wasted without political will.
On Friday, more criticism piled up over Africa's handling of
the Congo conflict. A European Union envoy to central Africa who is attending
the summit told Mozambique's state radio that the region's leaders have no
political will to solve the conflict there.
The summit, which is being held in a brand new Chinese-funded
conference center, will continue through Saturday. But journalists, who have | | |