Allied
Irish Banks (AIB) says the alleged fraud discovered earlier this month
at its US subsidiary had been going on for five years.
"The periods in which
the losses arose extend back to 1997," said chief executive
Michael Buckley.
I am determined to spare no effort in
repairing the damage we have suffered
 |
|
Michael Buckley
AIB chief |
The revelation came
as the bank reported its results for 2001 and finalised the losses it
incurred as a result of the fraud at $691m (£484m).
This is less than the
initial estimate of the losses, which amounted to $750m.
But the company was also
hit by the news that it had suffered another loss in the US, although
the £7m loss was not the result of fraud, but poor trading.
However, it will raise
more questions about the bank's risk management and control mechanism.
'Blow to shareholders'
The bank's management,
meanwhile, is still coming to terms with the huge losses at its
Allfirst subsidiary.
"The suspected fraud
has been a substantial blow to all AIB stakeholders," said Mr
Buckley.
"I am determined to
spare no effort in repairing the damage we have suffered."
Pre-tax profits during
2001 fell 47% to 612m euros (£374m; $535m).
Austin Hughes, chief
economist with rival IIB bank in Dublin, told the BBC's World Business
Report that it was a big hit for AIB.
"But at the same time
it shows that the bank is still fairly strong in as much as it can
absorb it," he said.
Without the $691m loss,
the bank would have seen its pre-tax profits rise 10% to 1,4bn euros.
'Rogue trader'
The bank has blamed the
alleged fraud at its subsidiary Allfirst on the actions of currency
trader John Rusnak.
Mr Rusnak's lawyers have
insisted that he did not steal money from the bank.
Allfirst has reported a
net loss of $36.8 for 2001, down from its restated net profits of
$47.3m.
Following the revelations
of the loss, questions were asked about AIB's internal controls and
risk management processes.
The FBI and AIB are both
currently investigating the circumstances behind the loss.